The Supreme Court of India has upheld Karnataka’s doctor transfer policy, reinforcing the principles of administrative equity and fair public postings. Read the full judgment details and implications for government doctors.

Landmark Judgment in Service Jurisprudence

In a significant ruling in the field of service jurisprudence, the Supreme Court of India has dismissed a petition filed by a group of government doctors. These doctors challenged their transfer from Bengaluru to various districts across Karnataka under a newly implemented state transfer policy.

Doctors’ Plea Rejected by Apex Court

The petitioners claimed that the policy unfairly singled them out by reclassifying Bengaluru regions and issuing abrupt transfers without sufficient notice. However, the Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Ujjal Bhuyan and Justice K. Vinod Chandran dismissed the plea. The judges emphasized that no government employee holds a fundamental right to remain posted in any particular city, regardless of its infrastructure or appeal.

Court Highlights Duty of Public Servants

“Bangalore may be alluring, but other regions are also developed and in need of skilled personnel,” the Court observed. It highlighted the responsibility of public servants to serve wherever the government deems necessary.

Reinforcing Administrative Equity and Policy Consistency

This ruling is a reaffirmation of administrative fairness and equitable treatment in public sector employment. It sets a precedent that employees cannot demand exemption from statewide transfer policies without clear legal justification or infringement of rights.

Implications for Government Service Transfers

The verdict sends a strong message: personal preference cannot override the larger public interest. It ensures uniformity and integrity in implementing public service policies across states and departments.