sadalawpublications.com

September 17, 2025

Pakistan Confirms India Rejected US Mediation During Operation Sindoor

Trending Today Pakistan Confirms India Rejected US Mediation During Operation Sindoor Deadline-Pressure Builds: Scott Bessent on U.S.-China TikTok Deal Before September 17 Tragedy in the Hills: Dehradun Floods, Landslides Leave 13 Dead, 16 Missing “Pray to Lord Vishnu”: Supreme Court Refuses to Entertain Plea to Restore Beheaded Idol at Khajuraho Supreme Court to Decide Validity of All Religious Conversion Laws; Transfers Cases from High Courts to Itself Mother Can’t Be Denied Child Custody Merely Because She Is Not as Wealthy as Father: J&K High Court We Will Have the Best ADR in the World: Supreme Court Justice PK Mishra at DAW 2025 Supreme Court Warns of Nullifying Entire Bihar Electoral Roll Revision if Illegality Found Anatomy of a Crash: The Story of Gagan Preet Makkad and Navjot Singh Preserving Ties, Protecting Sovereignty: India’s U.S. Strategy Pakistan Confirms India Rejected US Mediation During Operation Sindoor Shivani Garg 17 September 2025 Introduction: Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar has claimed that the United States offered to mediate between India and Pakistan during the escalation known as Operation Sindoor, but India categorically rejected the offer. The controversy highlights India’s consistent refusal to accept third-party involvement in disputes with Pakistan, reaffirming its bilateral-only stance. Background: Operation Sindoor followed a major escalation after the Pahalgam terror attack, with India launching strong retaliatory measures. Historically, third parties—including the U.S.—have occasionally claimed involvement in defusing India-Pakistan tensions. India, however, has maintained that any dialogue with Pakistan must occur directly, without external mediation, particularly on issues relating to security and Kashmir. Key Developments: Ishaq Dar said U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio offered to mediate a ceasefire around May 10. India, according to Dar, rejected this outright, insisting that talks must remain bilateral. Pakistan expressed openness to mediation, stressing the need for “comprehensive” dialogue, covering terrorism, trade, economy, and Jammu & Kashmir. Issues: India’s Rejection: India’s official stance is that no third-party role was involved in ending hostilities. Conflicting Narratives: Pakistan claims the U.S. attempted mediation, while India insists ceasefire communications were handled through military channels (DGMO-level). Sovereignty Concerns: India frames foreign involvement as undermining sovereignty and legitimizing external interference in national security issues. Diplomatic Optics: U.S. claims (current or past, e.g., Trump) of involvement create political sensitivities for India, suggesting dependence on outside pressure. Current Status: India’s Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar and Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri reiterated that India “never accepted mediation, does not accept it, and will never accept it.” Prime Minister Modi has consistently underlined that all issues with Pakistan are bilateral. Pakistan continues to push for wider, mediated dialogue, but India remains unmoved. Conclusion: The exchange underscores the entrenched positions of both nations: Pakistan’s openness to external facilitation versus India’s strict adherence to bilateralism. While mediation claims from the U.S. may persist, India’s rejection signals continuity in its foreign policy doctrine — keeping control over the narrative of sovereignty, security, and regional stability. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Pakistan Confirms India Rejected US Mediation During Operation Sindoor Sada Law • September 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Deadline-Pressure Builds: Scott Bessent on U.S.-China TikTok Deal Before September 17 Sada Law • September 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Tragedy in the Hills: Dehradun Floods, Landslides Leave 13 Dead, 16 Missing Sada Law • September 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Pakistan Confirms India Rejected US Mediation During Operation Sindoor Read More »

Deadline-Pressure Builds: Scott Bessent on U.S.-China TikTok Deal Before September 17

Trending Today Deadline-Pressure Builds: Scott Bessent on U.S.-China TikTok Deal Before September 17 Tragedy in the Hills: Dehradun Floods, Landslides Leave 13 Dead, 16 Missing “Pray to Lord Vishnu”: Supreme Court Refuses to Entertain Plea to Restore Beheaded Idol at Khajuraho Supreme Court to Decide Validity of All Religious Conversion Laws; Transfers Cases from High Courts to Itself Mother Can’t Be Denied Child Custody Merely Because She Is Not as Wealthy as Father: J&K High Court We Will Have the Best ADR in the World: Supreme Court Justice PK Mishra at DAW 2025 Supreme Court Warns of Nullifying Entire Bihar Electoral Roll Revision if Illegality Found Anatomy of a Crash: The Story of Gagan Preet Makkad and Navjot Singh Preserving Ties, Protecting Sovereignty: India’s U.S. Strategy URBAN COMPANY & DEV ACCELERATOR IPOS: ALLOTMENT TODAY, GMP SURGING – HOW TO CHECK STATUS LIVE Deadline-Pressure Builds: Scott Bessent on U.S.-China TikTok Deal Before September 17   Shivani Garg 17 September 2025 Introduction: With a looming September 17 deadline, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced that a framework agreement has been reached between the U.S. and China over TikTok’s U.S. operations. The deal aims to bring TikTok’s American business under U.S. control but is not yet fully finalized, leaving crucial details unresolved. Background: TikTok, owned by China’s ByteDance, has long faced U.S. scrutiny over national security risks, especially regarding data privacy and potential Chinese government influence. Under a U.S. law, TikTok must divest its U.S. business by September 17, 2025, or face a ban. Previous attempts at similar deals faced roadblocks, making this new framework agreement a significant development in ongoing trade and security negotiations. Key Developments: Framework deal reached in Madrid trade talks, but key commercial terms remain unsettled. Focus is on shifting control of TikTok’s U.S. operations to American hands. Debate continues over ByteDance’s future role — full divestment versus limited stake/licensing. Issues: National Security: U.S. seeks strict safeguards against Chinese data access and algorithm manipulation. Cultural/Algorithmic Concerns: China aims to preserve TikTok’s “Chinese characteristics,” including its recommendation algorithm. Uncertainty in Structure: Ownership, licensing of intellectual property, and U.S. investor roles remain undecided. Deadline Pressure: September 17 date gives U.S. negotiating leverage but may force rushed or incomplete solutions. Current Status: A preliminary framework exists but requires detailed negotiations to finalize. Rumors suggest a possible extension of up to 90 days to iron out unresolved aspects. Both governments remain cautious: the U.S. emphasizes security while China defends its technological interests. Conclusion: The TikTok deal remains a high-stakes issue at the intersection of trade, technology, and national security. While progress has been made, the September 17 deadline looms large, and the coming days will determine whether TikTok’s U.S. future lies in full American ownership, partial licensing, or continued uncertainty. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Deadline-Pressure Builds: Scott Bessent on U.S.-China TikTok Deal Before September 17 Sada Law • September 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Tragedy in the Hills: Dehradun Floods, Landslides Leave 13 Dead, 16 Missing Sada Law • September 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments “Pray to Lord Vishnu”: Supreme Court Refuses to Entertain Plea to Restore Beheaded Idol at Khajuraho Sada Law • September 16, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Deadline-Pressure Builds: Scott Bessent on U.S.-China TikTok Deal Before September 17 Read More »

Tragedy in the Hills: Dehradun Floods, Landslides Leave 13 Dead, 16 Missing

Trending Today Tragedy in the Hills: Dehradun Floods, Landslides Leave 13 Dead, 16 Missing “Pray to Lord Vishnu”: Supreme Court Refuses to Entertain Plea to Restore Beheaded Idol at Khajuraho Supreme Court to Decide Validity of All Religious Conversion Laws; Transfers Cases from High Courts to Itself Mother Can’t Be Denied Child Custody Merely Because She Is Not as Wealthy as Father: J&K High Court We Will Have the Best ADR in the World: Supreme Court Justice PK Mishra at DAW 2025 Supreme Court Warns of Nullifying Entire Bihar Electoral Roll Revision if Illegality Found Anatomy of a Crash: The Story of Gagan Preet Makkad and Navjot Singh Preserving Ties, Protecting Sovereignty: India’s U.S. Strategy URBAN COMPANY & DEV ACCELERATOR IPOS: ALLOTMENT TODAY, GMP SURGING – HOW TO CHECK STATUS LIVE RUSSIA REAFFIRMS FIRM ALLIANCE WITH INDIA, TELLS US ATTEMPTS TO UNDERMINE IT WILL FAIL Tragedy in the Hills: Dehradun Floods, Landslides Leave 13 Dead, 16 Missing   Shivani Garg 17 September 2025 Introduction: Heavy overnight rains in Dehradun district triggered devastating floods and landslides, leaving at least 13 people dead and 16 missing. The extreme weather caused severe damage to infrastructure, homes, religious sites, and stranded thousands of tourists, while rescue efforts continue amid worsening conditions. Background: Dehradun, located in Uttarakhand’s fragile Himalayan belt, is prone to extreme rainfall events, cloudbursts, and landslides. In recent years, climate change and unregulated construction near rivers and hillsides have heightened the vulnerability of the region. This week’s rainfall — ranging from 192–264 mm in some areas — was intense enough to mimic cloudburst conditions, unleashing widespread destruction. Key Developments: Rainfall & Damage: Sahastradhara and surrounding areas experienced cloudburst-like rainfall, causing rivers to swell and bridges to collapse. The Dehradun-Mussoorie road and other key routes were blocked or washed away. Infrastructure Impact: Shops, markets, and houses near rivers were destroyed. The historic Tapkeshwar Mahadev Temple was submerged. Tourist hubs like Sahastradhara and Maldevta were heavily damaged. Casualties: 13 confirmed dead, 16 missing, including six labourers swept away in Tons River at Premnagar. Issues: Fragile Himalayan ecology and rising frequency of extreme rainfall events. Poor planning and unregulated construction in riverbeds and hill slopes. Blocked or destroyed roads leaving thousands stranded, especially tourists in Mussoorie. Disruption of essential services (water, electricity, schooling). Current Status: SDRF, NDRF, local police, and PWD teams are conducting large-scale rescue and relief efforts. Villagers are being evacuated from high-risk zones. Schools and Anganwadi centres have been shut, and red alerts for landslides remain in effect. Authorities are focused on clearing roads and restoring connectivity, but access to Mussoorie remains blocked. Conclusion: The Dehradun floods underscore the urgent need for disaster preparedness, resilient infrastructure, and sustainable development in Uttarakhand’s ecologically sensitive zones. While rescue operations continue, the immediate challenge lies in safeguarding lives, restoring connectivity, and providing relief to stranded citizens and tourists. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Tragedy in the Hills: Dehradun Floods, Landslides Leave 13 Dead, 16 Missing Sada Law • September 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments “Pray to Lord Vishnu”: Supreme Court Refuses to Entertain Plea to Restore Beheaded Idol at Khajuraho Sada Law • September 16, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court to Decide Validity of All Religious Conversion Laws; Transfers Cases from High Courts to Itself Sada Law • September 16, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Tragedy in the Hills: Dehradun Floods, Landslides Leave 13 Dead, 16 Missing Read More »