sadalawpublications.com

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Menu

June 7, 2025

Delhi High Court Slams DPS Dwarka for Publicly Shaming Students Over Unpaid Fees

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Delhi High Court Slams DPS Dwarka for Publicly Shaming Students Over Unpaid Fees AIMPLB to File Contempt Petition Against Centre Over Launch of Waqf Umeed Portal Amid Supreme Court Hearing on Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025 Supreme Court Forms Committee to Manage Overcrowding and Ban Illegal Mining in Ranthambore Tiger Reserve Kerala High Court Orders Disclosure of Cargo and Oil Spill Data from MSC Elsa Sinking on Environment Day Pakistani National Living in Goa Since 2016 Appeals to Supreme Court After Visa Revocation Madras High Court Recognizes Same-Sex Couples as Family, Upholds LGBTQIA+ Rights and Personal Liberty Supreme Court Ends 50-Year Shahdara Gurdwara Dispute, Affirms Sikh Ownership Chhattisgarh Teachers File Petition Against School Rationalization Orders Telangana High Court Reviews Cow Protection Law Enforcement Ahead of Bakrid Festival Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Delhi High Court Slams DPS Dwarka for Publicly Shaming Students Over Unpaid Fees PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 07 June 2025 The Delhi High Court rebukes Delhi Public School, Dwarka for publicly shaming students over unpaid fees, emphasizing that schools must prioritize education over profit. Learn more about the court’s strong stance on student dignity and educational ethics. Delhi High Court Condemns DPS Dwarka for Public Shaming of Students Over Unpaid Fees On 6 June 2025, the Delhi High Court delivered a strong rebuke to Delhi Public School (DPS), Dwarka for publicly humiliating 31 students due to non-payment of school fees. The court labeled the school’s actions as a form of mental harassment that harms the students’ psychological well-being. DPS Dwarka Faces Criticism for Fee-Related Student Expulsions Earlier, DPS Dwarka had removed 31 students from its rolls, citing unpaid school fees. However, the school later reversed its decision and informed the court that the students had been reinstated. While the court acknowledged the resolution, it strongly condemned the initial conduct of the school. Court Calls Out Mental Harassment and Intimidation in Schools The bench stated unequivocally:“Public shaming or intimidation of a student due to financial default, particularly through force or coercion, constitutes mental harassment and undermines the psychological well-being and self-worth of a child.” The court denounced the alleged use of bouncers to block students from entering the school premises. It said such actions foster a “climate of fear, humiliation, and exclusion” that is incompatible with the core values of education. Schools Must Not Operate as Commercial Enterprises While the court acknowledged that schools have the right to collect fees, it stressed they must not function like business ventures.“Schools are institutions of learning, not profit-driven enterprises,” the court remarked. The emphasis was clear: educational institutions must prioritize value-based learning over monetary gain. Parental Responsibility in School Fee Payment The court also addressed the role of parents in the issue. It reminded them of their legal and moral obligation to comply with the court’s rulings regarding fee payments. The judgment urged parents to follow the directives issued on 16 May 2025 concerning fee dues. Balancing Educational Rights and Financial Responsibilities This case brings to light the ethical boundaries of how schools should address fee disputes. While fee collection is necessary, it must be conducted without compromising the dignity of students. The Delhi High Court’s intervention sets a precedent against treating children unfairly due to financial constraints. Conclusion: Schools Must Uphold Dignity, Not Profit The ruling from the Delhi High Court serves as a powerful reminder that schools exist to educate and nurture—not to intimidate or profit at the cost of student welfare. This case underscores the urgent need for compassion, accountability, and ethics in India’s education system. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Delhi High Court Slams DPS Dwarka for Publicly Shaming Students Over Unpaid Fees Delhi High Court Slams DPS Dwarka for Publicly Shaming Students Over Unpaid Fees Sada Law • June 7, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments AIMPLB to File Contempt Petition Against Centre Over Launch of Waqf Umeed Portal Amid Supreme Court Hearing on Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025 AIMPLB to File Contempt Petition Against Centre Over Launch of Waqf Umeed Portal Amid Supreme Court Hearing on Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025 Sada Law • June 7, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Forms Committee to Manage Overcrowding and Ban Illegal Mining in Ranthambore Tiger Reserve Supreme Court Forms Committee to Manage Overcrowding and Ban Illegal Mining in Ranthambore Tiger Reserve Sada Law • June 7, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Delhi High Court Slams DPS Dwarka for Publicly Shaming Students Over Unpaid Fees Read More »

AIMPLB to File Contempt Petition Against Centre Over Launch of Waqf Umeed Portal Amid Supreme Court Hearing on Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today AIMPLB to File Contempt Petition Against Centre Over Launch of Waqf Umeed Portal Amid Supreme Court Hearing on Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025 Supreme Court Forms Committee to Manage Overcrowding and Ban Illegal Mining in Ranthambore Tiger Reserve Kerala High Court Orders Disclosure of Cargo and Oil Spill Data from MSC Elsa Sinking on Environment Day Pakistani National Living in Goa Since 2016 Appeals to Supreme Court After Visa Revocation Madras High Court Recognizes Same-Sex Couples as Family, Upholds LGBTQIA+ Rights and Personal Liberty Supreme Court Ends 50-Year Shahdara Gurdwara Dispute, Affirms Sikh Ownership Chhattisgarh Teachers File Petition Against School Rationalization Orders Telangana High Court Reviews Cow Protection Law Enforcement Ahead of Bakrid Festival Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy AIMPLB to File Contempt Petition Against Centre Over Launch of Waqf Umeed Portal Amid Supreme Court Hearing on Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025 Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 07 June 2025 The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) plans to file a contempt petition against the Central government over the launch of the Waqf Umeed Portal. The move comes amid ongoing Supreme Court of India hearings challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. AIMPLB Opposes Government’s Launch of Waqf Umeed Portal On June 5, 2025, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) publicly opposed the Central government’s decision to launch the Waqf Umeed Portal on June 6. The AIMPLB claims that the launch is unlawful and constitutes contempt of court, as the legal basis for the portal—the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025—is currently under judicial scrutiny in the Supreme Court of India. What Is the Controversy Over the Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025? The amendment to the Waqf Act 1995 aims to regulate Waqf properties, which are assets reserved for religious and charitable purposes under Islamic law. However, this new legislation has sparked widespread opposition: Several Muslim organizations, including AIMPLB, reject the amendment. Opposition parties, human rights groups, and minority communities (including Sikh and Christian groups) have voiced concerns. The Act is being challenged for allegedly discriminating against the Muslim community by affecting its constitutional rights over religious endowments. Supreme Court’s Role in the Waqf Amendment Dispute The Supreme Court of India is currently hearing multiple petitions challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. Key points include: The Court reserved its decision after extensive hearings led by Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih. Petitions were filed by prominent MPs such as Mohammad Jawed (Congress (Indian National Congress)) and Asaduddin Owaisi (All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen). Six BJP-governed states, including Haryana and Maharashtra, have filed intervention pleas supporting the amendment. The main legal debate focuses on the removal of “waqf by user” from the Act’s definition, which affects historical mosques, graveyards, and charitable properties. Why AIMPLB Considers the Portal Launch Contempt of Court AIMPLB argues that launching the Waqf Umeed Portal and mandating Waqf property registration before the Supreme Court’s ruling violates the court’s authority. The Board urges: Muslims and State Waqf Boards to avoid using the portal until the Court issues its verdict. The government to halt enforcement of the amendment until the legal challenges are resolved. Centre’s Defense of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 The Union government claims the amendment is necessary to curb misuse of Waqf provisions, which previously allowed encroachment on private and public lands. Key points from the Centre’s defense include: A 116% increase in “auqaf area” since the 2013 Waqf Act amendment highlighted growing misuse. The abolition of “waqf by user” aims to ensure that Waqf property registrations meet legal requirements. The government insists that the right to dedicate property for religious purposes remains protected, but under a regulated legal framework. What’s Next for the Waqf Amendment Legal Battle? With the Supreme Court’s decision pending, this case remains a critical issue for religious rights, property regulation, and minority protections in India. The outcome will impact: The future regulation of Waqf properties. The relationship between the government and religious communities. Legal definitions and protections for historical religious sites. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

AIMPLB to File Contempt Petition Against Centre Over Launch of Waqf Umeed Portal Amid Supreme Court Hearing on Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025 Read More »

Supreme Court Forms Committee to Manage Overcrowding and Ban Illegal Mining in Ranthambore Tiger Reserve

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Forms Committee to Manage Overcrowding and Ban Illegal Mining in Ranthambore Tiger Reserve Kerala High Court Orders Disclosure of Cargo and Oil Spill Data from MSC Elsa Sinking on Environment Day Pakistani National Living in Goa Since 2016 Appeals to Supreme Court After Visa Revocation Madras High Court Recognizes Same-Sex Couples as Family, Upholds LGBTQIA+ Rights and Personal Liberty Supreme Court Ends 50-Year Shahdara Gurdwara Dispute, Affirms Sikh Ownership Chhattisgarh Teachers File Petition Against School Rationalization Orders Telangana High Court Reviews Cow Protection Law Enforcement Ahead of Bakrid Festival Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PEOPLESCIENT Supreme Court Forms Committee to Manage Overcrowding and Ban Illegal Mining in Ranthambore Tiger Reserve Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 07 June 2025 Supreme Court forms committee to manage overcrowding at Ranthambore Tiger Reserve’s Trinetra Temple and orders Rajasthan to ban illegal mining in the core tiger habitat. Learn about the court’s efforts to protect this critical wildlife reserve. Introduction The Supreme Court of India has taken significant steps to tackle the critical issues of overcrowding and illegal mining in the Ranthambore Tiger Reserve. On May 30, 2025, a three-member committee was established to find effective solutions that balance the needs of wildlife conservation and the devotees of the Trinetra Ganesha Temple situated within the reserve. Supreme Court’s Intervention in Ranthambore Tiger Reserve Management The Supreme Court bench, led by Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justices AG Masih and AS Chandurkar (note: Wikipedia page may not exist, so this is a placeholder), heard an application focused on protecting the Critical Tiger Habitat (CTH) and preserving the ecological integrity of Ranthambore. Key concerns raised included: Overcrowding during religious gatherings at Trinetra Temple Illegal mining operations within the core zone Unlawful construction and commercial activities Delay in declaring Eco-Sensitive Zones (ESZ) Preservation of historic structures in the reserve Formation and Role of the Three-Member Committee To address these issues, the Court appointed a committee comprising: The Collector of Sawai Madhopur The Field Director of Ranthambore Tiger Reserve A member of the Central Empowered Committee (CEC) Committee Mandate The committee is tasked with balancing the interests of the Trinetra Temple worshippers and the conservation goals of the Ranthambore Tiger Reserve. This includes: Ensuring stakeholder representation, including the temple trust Recommending measures to control overcrowding and vehicle traffic Proposing steps to safeguard the Critical Tiger Habitat from illegal activities Supreme Court Orders Ban on Illegal Mining in the Core Zone The Rajasthan State Government has been directed to enforce a strict ban on all mining operations within the core areas of Ranthambore Tiger Reserve. The Court emphasized zero tolerance for mining activities to preserve the habitat critical for tiger conservation. Rajasthan is required to submit a detailed affidavit within six weeks outlining the actions taken to prohibit mining in the reserve. Addressing Key Issues Impacting Ranthambore Tiger Reserve 1. Managing Faith-Based Assemblies at Trinetra Temple The committee will recommend solutions to manage the large crowds visiting the temple without disturbing wildlife habitats. 2. Preventing Illegal Mining in the Critical Tiger Habitat Strict enforcement against unlawful mineral extraction is essential to protect the ecological balance. 3. Controlling Unauthorized Construction and Commercial Activity Regulations must be strengthened to prevent illegitimate building and trade activities in the reserve. 4. Eco-Sensitive Zone (ESZ) Notification Delay Timely declaration of ESZs near Ranthambore is crucial to extend environmental safeguards. 5. Preserving Historic Buildings Historic structures within the reserve require conservation efforts alongside wildlife protection. Conclusion The Supreme Court’s decisive action to form a dedicated committee and impose mining bans marks a vital step toward preserving Ranthambore Tiger Reserve’s unique ecosystem. Balancing religious activities and wildlife conservation will help protect India’s rich biodiversity while respecting cultural heritage. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Forms Committee to Manage Overcrowding and Ban Illegal Mining in Ranthambore Tiger Reserve Read More »

Kerala High Court Orders Disclosure of Cargo and Oil Spill Data from MSC Elsa Sinking on Environment Day

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Kerala High Court Orders Disclosure of Cargo and Oil Spill Data from MSC Elsa Sinking on Environment Day Pakistani National Living in Goa Since 2016 Appeals to Supreme Court After Visa Revocation Madras High Court Recognizes Same-Sex Couples as Family, Upholds LGBTQIA+ Rights and Personal Liberty Supreme Court Ends 50-Year Shahdara Gurdwara Dispute, Affirms Sikh Ownership Chhattisgarh Teachers File Petition Against School Rationalization Orders Telangana High Court Reviews Cow Protection Law Enforcement Ahead of Bakrid Festival Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PEOPLESCIENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SARIN PARTNERS Kerala High Court Orders Disclosure of Cargo and Oil Spill Data from MSC Elsa Sinking on Environment Day Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 07 June 2025 On World Environment Day, the Kerala High Court directs the State government to disclose cargo and oil spill details from the MSC Elsa sinking, ensuring transparency and environmental accountability. Kerala High Court’s Directive on MSC Elsa Oil Spill Case On June 5, 2025, the Kerala High Court issued a significant directive mandating the State government to publicly disclose all information related to the hazardous cargo and oil spill caused by the sinking of the Liberian cargo ship MSC Elsa-3 off the Alappuzha coast. This decision came amid growing concerns about marine pollution and the impact on local fishing communities. Background: MSC Elsa Sinking and Environmental Concerns On May 24, 2025, the MSC Elsa-3 sank approximately 25 km southwest of Alappuzha while en route from Vizhinjam to Kochi. The vessel was carrying diesel, bunker oil, calcium carbide, and plastic nurdles — substances known to be harmful to marine life and coastal ecosystems. The spill sparked widespread environmental worries, particularly for the coastal districts of Alappuzha, Kollam, Ernakulam, and Thiruvananthapuram. The incident also led to a fishing ban covering 20 nautical miles, significantly affecting traditional fishermen. Public Interest Litigation (PIL) by TN Prathapan Congress leader and former Member of Parliament TN Prathapan filed a PIL demanding transparency, environmental remediation, and compensation for those affected. The petition pointed out that despite the 2016 Oil Spill Contingency Plan by the Kerala State Pollution Control Board, preventive measures were not adequately implemented. Prathapan, also Chairman of the Kerala Fishermen Coordination Committee, emphasized the need for a high-level expert committee to assess the environmental damage and propose restoration and compensation. Court’s Response and State Government’s Role The Kerala High Court Bench, led by Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Basant Balaji, directed the State to make all relevant data about hazardous cargo and the oil spill publicly accessible, highlighting the significance of transparency on World Environment Day. The Government Attorney assured the Court that an expert committee has been formed and remedial measures are underway. However, the Court emphasized timely disclosure of information and ordered both Central and State governments to submit detailed action reports within two weeks. Impact on Marine Ecology and Local Communities The spill has raised alarms about long-term damage to marine ecology and the livelihoods of fishing communities. The Court’s directive aims to promote accountability and ensure effective environmental protection and rehabilitation efforts in Kerala’s coastal regions. What’s Next in the MSC Elsa Case? The Kerala High Court will review the progress of environmental remediation and government action after the submission of reports. The case highlights the importance of enforcing maritime pollution laws and protecting vulnerable ecosystems from hazardous cargo incidents. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Kerala High Court Orders Disclosure of Cargo and Oil Spill Data from MSC Elsa Sinking on Environment Day Read More »

Pakistani National Living in Goa Since 2016 Appeals to Supreme Court After Visa Revocation

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Pakistani National Living in Goa Since 2016 Appeals to Supreme Court After Visa Revocation Madras High Court Recognizes Same-Sex Couples as Family, Upholds LGBTQIA+ Rights and Personal Liberty Supreme Court Ends 50-Year Shahdara Gurdwara Dispute, Affirms Sikh Ownership Chhattisgarh Teachers File Petition Against School Rationalization Orders Telangana High Court Reviews Cow Protection Law Enforcement Ahead of Bakrid Festival Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PEOPLESCIENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SARIN PARTNERS JOB OPPORTUNITY AT VIDHI CENTRE FOR LEGAL POLICY Pakistani National Living in Goa Since 2016 Appeals to Supreme Court After Visa Revocation Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 07 June 2025 A Pakistani national residing in Goa since 2016 on a long-term visa has moved the Supreme Court of India after India revoked visas for Pakistani citizens post-Pahalgam attack. Learn more about the case, legal response, and visa policy changes. Background – Pakistani Citizen Residing in Goa on Long-Term Visa A Pakistani national, who claims to have been living in Goa since 2016 on a valid long-term visa, has approached the Supreme Court of India to challenge the recent Government of India decision to revoke visas for Pakistani nationals. The individual asserts he was born in India and has maintained legal residency in Goa for nearly a decade. His appeal follows a government notification issued after the Pahalgam terror attack, which led to the cancellation of most visas granted to Pakistani citizens. Supreme Court Hearing and Legal Arguments The petition came before a bench comprising Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma. During the hearing, the petitioner’s legal counsel referenced the Union government’s notification stating that all visas granted to Pakistani nationals were revoked as of April 27, except for categories like medical, diplomatic, official, and long-term visas. When Justice Karol remarked, “Then go back,” the lawyer responded that the petitioner is not unwilling to leave but requested the court to consider specific conditions outlined in the long-term visa regulations. Bench Queries and Petitioner’s Legal Route The court questioned why the petitioner did not approach the Bombay High Court, which has jurisdiction over Goa, before coming to the Supreme Court. The counsel explained that local police visits created concerns for the petitioner, prompting a direct approach to the apex court. The bench eventually agreed to list the matter for a detailed hearing, taking note of the petitioner’s claim of Indian birth and long-standing residence. Government Order – Visa Revocation for Pakistani Nationals In its official statement, the Government of India clarified that all currently valid visas for Pakistani nationals—with the exception of medical (valid until April 29), long-term, diplomatic, and official visas—were revoked effective April 27. This directive was issued following heightened security concerns after the Pahalgam attack, which triggered a reassessment of India’s visa policy for Pakistani citizens. Implications of Visa Policy Changes on Pakistani Residents in India This case brings attention to the uncertainty faced by Pakistani nationals in India, particularly those residing on long-term or humanitarian grounds. The government’s directive has raised legal and humanitarian questions, especially for those who claim deep ties to India through birth or long-term residence. Conclusion – Awaiting Supreme Court’s Decision As the Supreme Court of India prepares to examine the matter further, this case could set a precedent for how India treats visa-holding Pakistani nationals in light of evolving national security policies. The outcome may affect similar long-term residents seeking legal clarity and protection under Indian law. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Pakistani National Living in Goa Since 2016 Appeals to Supreme Court After Visa Revocation Read More »

Madras High Court Recognizes Same-Sex Couples as Family, Upholds LGBTQIA+ Rights and Personal Liberty

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today AIMPLB to File Contempt Petition Against Centre Over Launch of Waqf Umeed Portal Amid Supreme Court Hearing on Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025 Supreme Court Forms Committee to Manage Overcrowding and Ban Illegal Mining in Ranthambore Tiger Reserve Kerala High Court Orders Disclosure of Cargo and Oil Spill Data from MSC Elsa Sinking on Environment Day Pakistani National Living in Goa Since 2016 Appeals to Supreme Court After Visa Revocation Madras High Court Recognizes Same-Sex Couples as Family, Upholds LGBTQIA+ Rights and Personal Liberty Supreme Court Ends 50-Year Shahdara Gurdwara Dispute, Affirms Sikh Ownership Chhattisgarh Teachers File Petition Against School Rationalization Orders Telangana High Court Reviews Cow Protection Law Enforcement Ahead of Bakrid Festival Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy Madras High Court Recognizes Same-Sex Couples as Family, Upholds LGBTQIA+ Rights and Personal Liberty PRABHAT BILTORIA 07 June 2025 Madras High Court affirms that same-sex couples can be recognized as families, highlighting LGBTQIA+ rights and personal liberty. Read how this landmark ruling strengthens legal protection for same-sex partners in India. Landmark Ruling by Madras High Court Recognizes Same-Sex Couples as Family In a significant move for LGBTQIA+ rights in India, the Madras High Court has ruled that while same-sex marriage is not yet legal under Indian law, same-sex couples can still be considered a family unit. This decision strengthens the legal recognition of chosen families and reinforces the right to personal liberty as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Case Overview – Lesbian Woman Freed from Illegal Detention The judgment came after a habeas corpus petition was filed by a 25-year-old woman from Tirupattur district. Her partner had approached the court seeking help after the woman was allegedly held against her will by her family in Gudiyatham, Vellore district. A division bench comprising Justices G.R. Swaminathan and V. Lakshminarayanan directed that the woman has full legal rights to leave with her partner, as per her own will. The court emphasized that no one, including her family, has the right to interfere with her personal decisions. Recognition of Chosen Families in LGBTQIA+ Law The court made a powerful statement: “Family can be established in ways other than marriage.” It highlighted that the concept of chosen family is now well-established in LGBTQIA+ legal frameworks, citing the NALSA v. Union of India and Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India cases, where the Supreme Court of India ruled that sexual orientation is a protected aspect of personal liberty. Police Inaction Criticized by the Court The bench also criticized the police departments in Gudiyatham (Tamil Nadu), Reddiyarpalayam (Puducherry), and Jeevan Beema Nagar (Karnataka) for failing to act on emergency complaints. The court stated that authorities became responsive only after the habeas corpus petition was filed. To ensure ongoing safety, a writ of continuing mandamus was issued, instructing the jurisdictional police to provide protection to the couple whenever necessary. Societal Resistance vs. Legal Clarity The woman’s mother alleged that her daughter had been “led astray” and turned into a “drug addict” by the petitioner. However, the court firmly rejected this narrative, noting that the woman appeared healthy and mentally sound. Although the petitioner referred to herself only as a “close friend,” the bench acknowledged the reluctance to disclose the true nature of their relationship due to the conservative societal climate—despite progressive legal rulings like NALSA and Navtej Johar. Reflections on Leila Seth and LGBTQIA+ Legal Journey The bench also recalled Leila Seth‘s heartfelt letter expressing her disappointment over the reversal of the Delhi High Court‘s ruling in the Naz Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi case, which initially decriminalized same-sex relationships. While Seth did not live to see the Supreme Court’s final decision in the Navtej Singh Johar case, her advocacy still resonates in the ongoing struggle for LGBTQIA+ equality. Final Verdict – Law Supports Adult Autonomy and Chosen Love The court concluded that the law leaves no room for ambiguity:Adults have the right to make life choices, and interference by family or society is not justified under the Constitution. The ruling reinforces the principle that personal liberty and sexual orientation are constitutionally protected. Conclusion: A Step Forward for LGBTQIA+ Rights in India This Madras High Court judgment marks a crucial step forward in the recognition of same-sex relationships and chosen families in India. While same-sex marriage remains unrecognized, this ruling sets a strong precedent that reaffirms legal protections, individual freedom, and the dignity of LGBTQIA+ individuals. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Madras High Court Recognizes Same-Sex Couples as Family, Upholds LGBTQIA+ Rights and Personal Liberty Read More »

Get A Quote
Get A Quote