Supreme Court Judgment on Cancellation of Default Bail After Chargesheet Filing in Serious Offence Cases – State Through CBI v. T. Gangi Reddy (2023)
Trending Today Supreme Court Judgment on Cancellation of Default Bail After Chargesheet Filing in Serious Offence Cases – State Through CBI v. T. Gangi Reddy (2023) Supreme Court Upholds Abolition of Orissa Administrative Tribunal: Union Government’s Power Affirmed Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Post-Charge-Sheet in Mahdoom Bava v. CBI (2023) Can High Courts Review CAT Orders from Outside Their Jurisdiction? Supreme Court Seeks Clarity in Sanjiv Chaturvedi Case Supreme Court Grants Interim Relief to Journalists in MP FIR Case, Directs Them to Seek High Court Protection Supreme Court Stays Madras HC Order Stopping NHAI Toll Collection on Madurai-Tuticorin Highway Supreme Court Refuses Urgent Hearing of Tamil Nadu’s Lawsuit Against Centre Over Rs 2291 Crore Education Funds Dispute Kerala High Court Upholds Widow’s Right to Marital Home Under Domestic Violence Act Bombay High Court Judge Cites Long Work Hours and Backlog for Delayed Judgment Upload in Landmark Property Dispute Case Supreme Court Landmark Ruling: Permanent Alimony and Home Ownership Rights for Divorced Women Supreme Court Judgment on Cancellation of Default Bail After Chargesheet Filing in Serious Offence Cases – State Through CBI v. T. Gangi Reddy (2023) REHA BHARGAV 11 June 2025 The Supreme Court ruled in CBI v. T. Gangi Reddy (2023) that default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC is not absolute and can be cancelled after filing a chargesheet in serious non-bailable offences. Learn about this landmark decision balancing bail rights and justice. Introduction: Supreme Court Clarifies the Scope of Default Bail In a significant judgment on January 16, 2023, the Supreme Court of India ruled in the case of State Through CBI v. T. Gangi Reddy @ Yerra Gangi Reddy that default bail under Section 167(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) is not an unassailable right. The Court clarified that such bail can be cancelled on merits after the filing of a chargesheet, especially in cases involving serious non-bailable offences like murder. This decision arose from the high-profile murder case of Y. S. Vivekananda Reddy, shedding light on the legal balance between individual liberty and the interests of justice. Case Background: Facts and Timeline The Crime and Initial Investigation Victim: Y. S. Vivekananda Reddy, former legislator and Member of Parliament Incident Date: March 2019 Initially registered under Section 174 CrPC (unnatural death), the case was later upgraded to Sections 302 and 120B IPC (murder and criminal conspiracy). Arrest and Default Bail Accused: T. Gangi Reddy Arrest Date: March 28, 2019 Due to delay in investigation, the accused was granted default bail on June 27, 2019, under Section 167(2) CrPC, which mandates bail if a chargesheet is not filed within 60 days. CBI Takes Over and Files Chargesheet The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) took over the case and filed a detailed chargesheet on October 26, 2021, implicating Gangi Reddy. CBI then moved to cancel the default bail, citing seriousness of the offence and strong prima facie evidence. Legal Issue: Can Default Bail Be Cancelled After Chargesheet? The central legal question before the Supreme Court was: Can an accused who has secured default bail due to delay in investigation lose that bail once a chargesheet is filed in serious, non-bailable cases? Arguments Before the Court CBI’s Arguments (Petitioner) Default bail is conditional, not absolute—it’s granted only because of a procedural delay. Once a chargesheet is filed, especially in heinous crimes like murder, the court has discretion to cancel bail based on the merits of the case. Continued bail poses a risk to the investigation, including potential tampering with evidence or witnesses. Respondent’s Arguments Default bail under Section 167(2) is a statutory right and should not be revoked merely because the investigation later concluded. Cancelling default bail would undermine the intent of Section 167(2), which aims to prevent indefinite pre-trial detention due to investigative delays. Supreme Court Judgment: Bail is Not Absolute Key Observations by the Court Presiding Judges: Justice M. R. Shah and Justice C. T. Ravikumar Date of Judgment: January 16, 2023 The Court held that default bail is not an absolute or indefeasible right. Once a chargesheet is filed with strong evidence in a serious offence, courts can cancel such bail. The ruling emphasized the gravity of the crime, likelihood of tampering with evidence, and the interests of justice. Impact of the Judgment This judgment reinforces that procedural safeguards like default bail are not meant to protect offenders indefinitely, especially when strong evidence emerges post-investigation. Conclusion: Balancing Liberty and Justice The Supreme Court’s ruling in CBI v. T. Gangi Reddy sets a critical precedent in Indian criminal law. It affirms that while the right to default bail safeguards against undue detention, it does not override the need for justice in serious criminal cases. Courts retain the discretion to cancel bail once substantial evidence surfaces, ensuring the integrity of the judicial process. Key Takeaways Default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC is not permanent. Courts can cancel bail after a chargesheet, especially in serious, non-bailable offences. The judgment upholds a balanced approach between personal liberty and public interest. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Judgment on Cancellation of Default Bail After Chargesheet Filing in Serious Offence Cases – State Through CBI v. T. Gangi Reddy (2023) Supreme Court Judgment on Cancellation of Default Bail After Chargesheet Filing in Serious Offence Cases – State Through CBI v. T. Gangi Reddy (2023) Sada Law • June 11, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds Abolition of Orissa Administrative Tribunal: Union Government’s Power Affirmed Supreme Court Upholds Abolition of Orissa Administrative Tribunal: Union Government’s Power Affirmed Sada Law • June 11, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Post-Charge-Sheet in Mahdoom Bava v. CBI (2023) Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Post-Charge-Sheet in Mahdoom Bava v. CBI (2023) Sada Law • June 11, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »
