Bombay High Court Overturns 36-Year-Old Pollution Conviction Against Gujarat Petro Chem Executives
Trending Today Karnataka High Court: Professors Not Public Officers, Quo Warranto Writ Inapplicable in Academic Appointments Bombay High Court Overturns 36-Year-Old Pollution Conviction Against Gujarat Petro Chem Executives Allahabad High Court Sparks Outrage by Granting Bail in Rape Case, Blaming Victim for Her Actions Supreme Court Orders AIIMS to Reassess MBBS Eligibility of PwBD Candidate Based on Om Rathod and Anmol Rulings Misuse of Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act: Challenges for Employers and Legal Loopholes Supreme Court Strikes Down Tamil Nadu Rule Requiring Title Proof for Property Registration Delhi High Court Fines Shazia Ilmi ₹25,000 in Privacy Violation Case Against Rajdeep Sardesai India and Nepal Sign MoU to Strengthen Judicial Cooperation and Legal Exchange Calcutta High Court Allows Anjani Putra Sena’s Ram Navami Rally in Howrah with Strict Conditions Waqf Amendment Bill Sparks Uproar: Opposition Moves Supreme Court Over Alleged Bias Against Muslims Bombay High Court Overturns 36-Year-Old Pollution Conviction Against Gujarat Petro Chem Executives SANOJ KR. PAUL 13 Apr 2025 Bombay High Court Quashes 36-Year-Old Water Pollution Conviction In a major ruling on April 2, 2025, the Bombay High Court overturned the convictions of two senior officials from Gujarat Petro Chem (Note: No specific Wikipedia page exists for Gujarat Petro Chem, so linked to Gujarat), ending a legal battle that lasted for over 30 years. The case dates back to 1996, when the company’s executives, P.A. Parekh and M. Chatterji, were convicted for allegedly discharging untreated sewage effluents into a stream, violating environmental laws. Despite being sentenced to 18 months in prison, the executives appealed the conviction, arguing that the charges were unclear and the evidence insufficient. The defence pointed out that the prosecution had failed to specify the executives’ direct roles in the pollution and had relied on vague accusations. Furthermore, they argued that the company had valid discharge permissions from the authorities. The High Court found several flaws in the case. First, it noted that the prosecution did not clearly define the roles of the accused. Secondly, the court highlighted that the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB) had not followed proper procedures for collecting evidence, particularly the water sample, which was a key part of the case. Because of these issues, the High Court quashed the convictions, ruling that the evidence wasn’t enough to prove guilt beyond doubt. This decision emphasizes the importance of clear, reliable evidence and proper procedures when holding individuals accountable for corporate actions. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Karnataka High Court: Professors Not Public Officers, Quo Warranto Writ Inapplicable in Academic Appointments Karnataka High Court: Professors Not Public Officers, Quo Warranto Writ Inapplicable in Academic Appointments sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bombay High Court Overturns 36-Year-Old Pollution Conviction Against Gujarat Petro Chem Executives Bombay High Court Overturns 36-Year-Old Pollution Conviction Against Gujarat Petro Chem Executives sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Allahabad High Court Sparks Outrage by Granting Bail in Rape Case, Blaming Victim for Her Actions Allahabad High Court Sparks Outrage by Granting Bail in Rape Case, Blaming Victim for Her Actions sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 11, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »