sadalawpublications.com

Ravi Shankar Prasad

Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking FIR Against Modi, Shah Over CAA

Trending Today Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking FIR Against Modi, Shah Over CAA Delhi High Court Rejects Bail Plea of Tahir Hussain in Ankit Sharma Murder Case Chennupati Kranthi Kumar vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. – Supreme Court Judgment (25 July 2023) MD. Asfak Alam vs. State of Jharkhand & Anr. – Supreme Court Judgment (31 July 2023) Bail Granted in Boini Mahipal v. State of Telangana: Supreme Court on Prolonged Undertrial Detention and Article 21 Opportunity of Hearing Before Summoning Under Section 319 CrPC: Supreme Court’s Ruling in Yashodhan Singh & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh Non-Compliance with Mandatory Safeguards Under the NDPS Act: Supreme Court Acquittal in Suresh Thipmppa Shetty v. State of Maharashtra Delhi High Court Reprimands Police SI for Threatening Lawyers in Court Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules Attempt to Initiate Conversation with Woman Not Offence Under IPC Section 354 SG Tushar Mehta Flags Integrity Crisis in Arbitration, Calls for Parliamentary Intervention Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking FIR Against Modi, Shah Over CAA Kashak Agarwala 26 September 2025 Introduction On September 26, 2025, the Rajasthan High Court dismissed a petition seeking registration of an FIR against Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, and former Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad in relation to the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), 2019. The Court termed the plea as baseless and frivolous, imposing a cost of ₹50,000 on the petitioner, Advocate Puran Chander Sen. Background The petition stemmed from allegations that the CAA had triggered violence, murders, and injuries across the country. In 2020, Advocate Sen had approached the Govindgarh police station in Alwar, demanding an FIR under IPC Sections 302 (murder) and 120-B (criminal conspiracy). When no action was taken, he moved the magistrate’s court and sessions court, both of which dismissed the plea. He eventually petitioned the High Court. Key Developments Justice Sudesh Bansal’s bench heard the case. The Court held that the allegations were unsupported by evidence, details of victims, or causal links to CAA. The Court questioned the filing in Alwar district, where no incidents were reported. The petition was called “preposterous, effete, and concocted.” A ₹50,000 cost was imposed, payable to the Rajasthan High Court Litigants’ Welfare Fund. The Court gave liberty to the respondents (Modi, Shah, Prasad) and the State to pursue further civil or criminal action against the petitioner. Issues Whether allegations of violence linked to CAA, without evidence, can form the basis of an FIR against top government officials. Whether a practicing advocate can file politically motivated or frivolous criminal petitions without factual backing. The misuse of courts for political or publicity purposes and its impact on judicial integrity. Current Status The petition stands dismissed. Petitioner Advocate Puran Chander Sen is liable to pay ₹50,000 within four weeks. Respondents retain the option to pursue civil or criminal action against him. Conclusion The Rajasthan High Court’s order reinforces the judiciary’s strong stance against frivolous litigation and misuse of legal processes. By imposing costs and criticizing the petitioner, the Court emphasized that unfounded petitions, especially against senior constitutional figures, will not be entertained. The ruling also underlined the responsibility of advocates to uphold professional standards and avoid filing baseless claims that risk undermining public trust in the judicial system. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking FIR Against Modi, Shah Over CAA Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Rejects Bail Plea of Tahir Hussain in Ankit Sharma Murder Case Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Reprimands Police SI for Threatening Lawyers in Court Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking FIR Against Modi, Shah Over CAA Read More »

“Hydrogen Bomb Ahead”: Rahul Gandhi Vows Exposure of Massive Vote Theft

Trending Today “Hydrogen Bomb Ahead”: Rahul Gandhi Vows Exposure of Massive Vote Theft Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Reply to Tamil Nadu Plea on EWS Quota Reimbursements System that lets rapists walk free: Supreme Court Restores Conviction of Men Who Raped 12-Year-Old Supreme Court Calls for Paralegal Volunteers to Assist Voters in Bihar SIR Exercise LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CYRALAW LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CENTRE FOR CIVIL SOCIETY LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MALABAR GROUP LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT AMLEGALS LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT DESTEK INFOSOLUTIONS The Supreme Court reiterates that there is no direct appeal against NCDRC appellate orders; instead, the High Court has the remedy. “Hydrogen Bomb Ahead”: Rahul Gandhi Vows Exposure of Massive Vote Theft Shivani Garg Introduction Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has intensified his “vote chori” (vote theft) campaign, declaring that his party will soon drop a political “hydrogen bomb” of revelations—larger than the earlier “atom bomb” expose of Mahadevapura. Speaking in Patna at the culmination of the Voter Adhikar Yatra, Gandhi alleged that the BJP has not only stolen votes but also robbed citizens of their rights, democracy, and employment. Rahul Gandhi’s Allegations Hydrogen Bomb Claim: Rahul Gandhi warned that his upcoming disclosures would be so damaging that Prime Minister Narendra Modi “will not be able to show his face to the country.” Voter Adhikar Yatra: Presented as a mass movement, Gandhi framed the yatra as a struggle to reclaim democratic values, rallying supporters with slogans like “vote chor, gaddi chhor”. Systemic Erosion: He accused the BJP of undermining democracy, employment opportunities, and people’s rights. Context and Build-Up Previous Allegations: In late August, Gandhi had dismissed the “Gujarat Model” as a “model of vote chori.” Promise of Evidence: He vowed to prove within six months that the BJP had stolen elections, pledging “beyond doubt” evidence of electoral malpractice. Political Strategy: The “hydrogen bomb” metaphor is being used to dramatize his campaign against alleged poll theft. BJP’s Counterattack Ravi Shankar Prasad’s Response: The senior BJP leader dismissed the remarks as irresponsible and incoherent. Credibility Questioned: Prasad argued that Rahul Gandhi’s repeated accusations weaken his credibility and demean his constitutional role as Leader of the Opposition. Political Impact: The BJP portrayed Gandhi’s comments as reckless rhetoric intended to provoke rather than substantiate. Analysis High-Stakes Rhetoric: The “hydrogen bomb” metaphor raises public expectations for concrete evidence; failure to deliver may backfire politically. Polarization Strategy: Gandhi is mobilizing public anger by framing alleged vote theft as a theft of democracy itself. Credibility Test: The episode underscores a battle of narratives—Rahul Gandhi’s promises of proof versus BJP’s insistence on credibility and stability. What Lies Ahead Evidence Release: Gandhi’s promised disclosures will be closely scrutinized to test the weight of his claims. Legal and Political Fallout: If credible, the revelations could spark legal battles and electoral reforms; if not, they may weaken the opposition’s campaign. Public Sentiment: The effectiveness of the “vote chori” campaign depends on whether citizens perceive it as genuine accountability or mere political theatre. Conclusion Rahul Gandhi’s “hydrogen bomb” warning marks an escalation in opposition politics, framing the BJP as systematically undermining democracy. The BJP’s rebuttal has placed the onus on Gandhi to substantiate his charges. The next phase of this confrontation could reshape the narrative around electoral legitimacy in India. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases “Hydrogen Bomb Ahead”: Rahul Gandhi Vows Exposure of Massive Vote Theft Sada Law • September 2, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Reply to Tamil Nadu Plea on EWS Quota Reimbursements Sada Law • September 2, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments System that lets rapists walk free: Supreme Court Restores Conviction of Men Who Raped 12-Year-Old Sada Law • September 2, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

“Hydrogen Bomb Ahead”: Rahul Gandhi Vows Exposure of Massive Vote Theft Read More »

Waqf Amendment Bill Sparks Uproar: Opposition Moves Supreme Court Over Alleged Bias Against Muslims

Trending Today Waqf Amendment Bill Sparks Uproar: Opposition Moves Supreme Court Over Alleged Bias Against Muslims “NALSA Files PIL for Humanitarian Release of Aged and Sick Inmates from Indian Jails” Which law states that Aadhaar is required to operate bank accounts? Questions for the Supreme Court the Delhi government’s refusal to grant workers’ allowances Opening the Monument Examining the Long-Term Effects of the 1981 Case Francis Coralie v. Union Territory of Delhi on Individual Liberty and Indian Jurisprudence Rajya Sabha Adopts Bill 2025 for Waqf (Amendment) Destruction in Kancha Gachibowli ‘forest’ area depicts an ‘alarming picture’, says SC NCLT Rejects Insolvency Plea Against Zomato Over Payment Dispute Actor Hansika Motwani files a motion in the Bombay High Court to quash a FIR after being booked in a Section 498A case. Supreme Court slams Telangana CM for “making mockery” of anti-defection law Union Minister Kiren Rijiju: The Waqf Amendment Bill Is Prospective Rather Than Retrospective Waqf Amendment Bill Sparks Uproar: Opposition Moves Supreme Court Over Alleged Bias Against Muslims MAHI SINHA 07 Apr 2025 The opposition parties are concerned about the Waqf Amendment Bill, which aims to change the 1995 law controlling Waqf properties. New Delhi: As the contentious Waqf Amendment Bill seeks the President‘s approval after passing both Houses of Parliament, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) has joined the Congress and Asaduddin Owaisi‘s AIMIM as the third major opposition party to take on the bill in the Supreme Court. Opposition parties contend that the proposed legislation, which aims to modify the 1995 law managing Waqf properties, is biased and threatens Muslims. AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan said in his plea that the government’s intervention violates minorities’ rights to run own institutions and that the amendment will diminish Muslims’ religious autonomy. Nonetheless, the government has insisted that the measure will help Muslim women and guarantee openness in the administration of Waqf properties. Mr. Khan contested the Waqf Amendment Bill’s constitutionality, claiming that it infringes upon multiple basic liberties of citizens, such as the freedom of equality, the management of religious matters, and the rights of minorities. He said that the measure violates minorities’ rights to run their religious and philanthropic organizations, restricts Muslims’ religious and cultural autonomy, and permits capricious presidential intervention. His suit comes after two other opposition MPs, Asaduddin Owaisi and Mohammad Jawed, of the Congress, filed identical objections. The law prejudices against Muslims by enforcing limits that are absent from the governance of other religious institutions, according to Mr. Jawed, a member of the joint parliamentary commission on the Waqf bill. The law’s provision allowing non-Muslims to serve on state boards and Waqf councils is one of the main points of contention. According to Mr. Owaisi, this is a serious constitutional infringement and isn’t the instance with the Hindu Endowment Board or the Jain Endowment Board. Speaking to NDTV yesterday, Mr. Owaisi claimed that the BJP is utilizing the vast majority in parliament to wage a war on Muslims by passing legislation that will ruin and take away all of their rights rather than reforms. BJP MP Ravi Shankar Prasad defended the bill, telling NDTV that it will increase transparency by holding Waqf boards responsible. He made it clear that no mosque or cemetery will be impacted in an effort to dispel concerns that the measure would seize Waqf sites. After a contentious debate between the opposition and treasury benches, the Lok Sabha passed the Waqf bill Thursday morning by 288 votes to 232. The Rajya Sabha then passed it with 128 votes in favor and 95 against. Following Friday’s weekly prayers, the bill’s approval triggered massive demonstrations in cities including Ahmedabad, Chennai, and Kolkata. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Waqf Amendment Bill Sparks Uproar: Opposition Moves Supreme Court Over Alleged Bias Against Muslims Waqf Amendment Bill Sparks Uproar: Opposition Moves Supreme Court Over Alleged Bias Against Muslims sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 7, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments “NALSA Files PIL for Humanitarian Release of Aged and Sick Inmates from Indian Jails” “NALSA Files PIL for Humanitarian Release of Aged and Sick Inmates from Indian Jails” sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 6, 2025 • Live cases • 1 Comment Which law states that Aadhaar is required to operate bank accounts? Questions for the Supreme Court the Delhi government’s refusal to grant workers’ allowances Which law states that Aadhaar is required to operate bank accounts? Questions for the Supreme Court the Delhi government’s refusal to grant workers’ allowances sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 5, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Waqf Amendment Bill Sparks Uproar: Opposition Moves Supreme Court Over Alleged Bias Against Muslims Read More »