sadalawpublications.com

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Menu

minority rights

Supreme Court Clears Uttarakhand’s Uniform Civil Code: A Historic Step Toward Gender Equality and Secular Law in India

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Clears Uttarakhand’s Uniform Civil Code: A Historic Step Toward Gender Equality and Secular Law in India Supreme Court Reviews CAA Rules 2024: Fresh Petitions Challenge Citizenship Law on Constitutional Grounds Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe into ₹3,200 Crore Bihar Foodgrain Scam: Political Fallout and Fight Against Corruption INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT INTERVENOR LEGAL SOLUTIONS, NEW DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT HEMVATI NANDAN BAHUGUNA GARHWAL UNIVERSITY, UTTARAKHAND LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT HEAD DIGITAL WORKS, DELHI INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT VOYAGER CAPITAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NLU DELHI JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DR. RAM MANOHAR LOHIYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, LUCKNOW INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE & POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT, BHOPAL Supreme Court Clears Uttarakhand’s Uniform Civil Code: A Historic Step Toward Gender Equality and Secular Law in India KASHISH JAHAN 30 June 2025 Discover how the Supreme Court’s green signal to Uttarakhand’s Uniform Civil Code marks a transformative step in India’s legal landscape, aiming for gender equality and secular civil laws across all communities. Uttarakhand Makes History with India’s First Uniform Civil Code: Supreme Court Gives Green Light In a landmark judgment with sweeping constitutional impact, the Supreme Court of India has approved the implementation of India’s first Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in Uttarakhand. Delivered on 28 June 2025, a bench led by Justice Sanjiv Khanna dismissed petitions challenging the draft bill, affirming the state’s constitutional authority to introduce a uniform set of civil laws for all citizens. What Is the Uniform Civil Code and Why It Matters The UCC seeks to standardize civil laws across religions, governing vital areas such as marriage, divorce, adoption, inheritance, and succession. Historically, these matters have been regulated by various religious personal laws in India. This move aligns with Article 44 of the Indian Constitution, a part of the Directive Principles of State Policy, which advocates for a common civil code as a step toward national integration and gender equality. The First State to Act: Uttarakhand’s Bold Initiative Uttarakhand has become the first Indian state since Independence to introduce a UCC. Spearheaded by Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami, the state government argues that a uniform civil law will eliminate gender and community-based disparities, ensuring fairness across religious and social lines. Opposition and Supreme Court’s Verdict Several minority groups and civil rights activists had challenged the draft, citing violations of Articles 25 and 26, which guarantee religious freedom. However, the Court ruled that these rights do not supersede the principles of equality and non-discrimination. Justice Khanna noted, “Religious practices must harmonize with constitutional morality and gender equality.” Key Provisions of the Draft UCC The proposed civil code introduces sweeping changes, including: Equal inheritance rights for sons and daughters Mandatory marriage registration across all religions Streamlined, gender-neutral divorce laws Adoption policies that do not discriminate based on gender or religion This proposal has drawn both praise and criticism—women’s rights organizations support the bill, while some conservative factions fear a loss of cultural identity. Public Consultation and Legislative Process Ahead Following the Court’s decision, the Dhami administration pledged widespread public consultation before tabling the final bill in the state Legislative Assembly. The Chief Minister hailed the judgment as a milestone in building a “modern, secular India.” Legal analysts suggest that Uttarakhand’s UCC could serve as a blueprint for states like Gujarat and Assam, which have shown interest in similar reforms. The BJP may even consider pushing for a nationwide UCC, subject to consensus and parliamentary procedures. Challenges: Balancing Secularism and Religious Identity Despite the forward momentum, the road ahead is complex. Critics argue that the bill must not become a tool for majoritarianism and must protect minority rights. Concerns remain about eroding unique cultural practices and the potential for legal overreach. Noted legal scholar Faizan Mustafa emphasized, “A Uniform Civil Code must not mean a Majoritarian Civil Code — it must protect diversity while upholding equality.” Women’s groups have echoed this, calling for robust protections for marginalized communities. Conclusion: A Landmark Moment for Civil Law in India Uttarakhand’s push for a Uniform Civil Code marks a pivotal moment in Indian legal history. As the state prepares to introduce the final bill, India enters a decisive chapter in its pursuit of civil uniformity, secular governance, and gender justice. Whether other states follow suit or this sparks broader debates, one thing is clear—the conversation on the UCC is no longer academic. It is happening, and it is historic. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Clears Uttarakhand’s Uniform Civil Code: A Historic Step Toward Gender Equality and Secular Law in India Sada Law • June 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Reviews CAA Rules 2024: Fresh Petitions Challenge Citizenship Law on Constitutional Grounds Sada Law • June 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe into ₹3,200 Crore Bihar Foodgrain Scam: Political Fallout and Fight Against Corruption Sada Law • June 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Clears Uttarakhand’s Uniform Civil Code: A Historic Step Toward Gender Equality and Secular Law in India Read More »

AIMPLB to File Contempt Petition Against Centre Over Launch of Waqf Umeed Portal Amid Supreme Court Hearing on Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today AIMPLB to File Contempt Petition Against Centre Over Launch of Waqf Umeed Portal Amid Supreme Court Hearing on Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025 Supreme Court Forms Committee to Manage Overcrowding and Ban Illegal Mining in Ranthambore Tiger Reserve Kerala High Court Orders Disclosure of Cargo and Oil Spill Data from MSC Elsa Sinking on Environment Day Pakistani National Living in Goa Since 2016 Appeals to Supreme Court After Visa Revocation Madras High Court Recognizes Same-Sex Couples as Family, Upholds LGBTQIA+ Rights and Personal Liberty Supreme Court Ends 50-Year Shahdara Gurdwara Dispute, Affirms Sikh Ownership Chhattisgarh Teachers File Petition Against School Rationalization Orders Telangana High Court Reviews Cow Protection Law Enforcement Ahead of Bakrid Festival Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy AIMPLB to File Contempt Petition Against Centre Over Launch of Waqf Umeed Portal Amid Supreme Court Hearing on Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025 Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 07 June 2025 The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) plans to file a contempt petition against the Central government over the launch of the Waqf Umeed Portal. The move comes amid ongoing Supreme Court of India hearings challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. AIMPLB Opposes Government’s Launch of Waqf Umeed Portal On June 5, 2025, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) publicly opposed the Central government’s decision to launch the Waqf Umeed Portal on June 6. The AIMPLB claims that the launch is unlawful and constitutes contempt of court, as the legal basis for the portal—the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025—is currently under judicial scrutiny in the Supreme Court of India. What Is the Controversy Over the Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025? The amendment to the Waqf Act 1995 aims to regulate Waqf properties, which are assets reserved for religious and charitable purposes under Islamic law. However, this new legislation has sparked widespread opposition: Several Muslim organizations, including AIMPLB, reject the amendment. Opposition parties, human rights groups, and minority communities (including Sikh and Christian groups) have voiced concerns. The Act is being challenged for allegedly discriminating against the Muslim community by affecting its constitutional rights over religious endowments. Supreme Court’s Role in the Waqf Amendment Dispute The Supreme Court of India is currently hearing multiple petitions challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. Key points include: The Court reserved its decision after extensive hearings led by Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih. Petitions were filed by prominent MPs such as Mohammad Jawed (Congress (Indian National Congress)) and Asaduddin Owaisi (All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen). Six BJP-governed states, including Haryana and Maharashtra, have filed intervention pleas supporting the amendment. The main legal debate focuses on the removal of “waqf by user” from the Act’s definition, which affects historical mosques, graveyards, and charitable properties. Why AIMPLB Considers the Portal Launch Contempt of Court AIMPLB argues that launching the Waqf Umeed Portal and mandating Waqf property registration before the Supreme Court’s ruling violates the court’s authority. The Board urges: Muslims and State Waqf Boards to avoid using the portal until the Court issues its verdict. The government to halt enforcement of the amendment until the legal challenges are resolved. Centre’s Defense of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 The Union government claims the amendment is necessary to curb misuse of Waqf provisions, which previously allowed encroachment on private and public lands. Key points from the Centre’s defense include: A 116% increase in “auqaf area” since the 2013 Waqf Act amendment highlighted growing misuse. The abolition of “waqf by user” aims to ensure that Waqf property registrations meet legal requirements. The government insists that the right to dedicate property for religious purposes remains protected, but under a regulated legal framework. What’s Next for the Waqf Amendment Legal Battle? With the Supreme Court’s decision pending, this case remains a critical issue for religious rights, property regulation, and minority protections in India. The outcome will impact: The future regulation of Waqf properties. The relationship between the government and religious communities. Legal definitions and protections for historical religious sites. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

AIMPLB to File Contempt Petition Against Centre Over Launch of Waqf Umeed Portal Amid Supreme Court Hearing on Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025 Read More »

AIMPLB Challenges WAQF Amendment Act 2025: Supreme Court Affidavit Highlights Risks of De-registration

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today AIMPLB Challenges WAQF Amendment Act 2025: Supreme Court Affidavit Highlights Risks of De-registration Supreme Court: Bribery Conviction Under PC Act Requires Proof of Demand Beyond Recovery of Tainted Notes Supreme Court Clarifies Modification Powers Under Arbitration Act in Landmark Ruling Supreme Court to Review Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Ruling on PMLA: Hearing Scheduled for May 7 Supreme Court Upholds LGBTQ+ Autonomy in Habeas Corpus Case: Guidelines Issued to High Courts Supreme Court Overturns Remission in Bilkis Bano Case: 2002 Gujarat Riots Convicts Ordered Back to Jail Supreme Court Grants Chhattisgarh State Option to Seek Case Transfer Amid Heated Liquor Scam Hearing Byju’s Withdraws Supreme Court Petition on Aakash Ownership: Karnataka HC Ruling Stands Supreme Court Affirms Group of Companies Doctrine: Non-Signatories Can Be Bound by Arbitration Agreements Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Removal of Unauthorized Gurudwara and Temple in Kharar AIMPLB Challenges Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Supreme Court Affidavit Highlights Risks of Deregistration MAHI SINHA 04 May 2025 Discover AIMPLB’s objections to the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, and its implications for waqf properties in India. Learn about the constitutional and legal challenges raised in the Supreme Court. AIMPLB Opposes Waqf Registration Requirement The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), through its General Secretary Mohammed Fazlurrahim, has raised concerns over the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. In its affidavit, AIMPLB challenges the Union Government’s claim that the new requirement for waqf registration is harmless and asserts that it undermines the legal recognition of waqfs-by-user. Context of the Case The Supreme Court is set to hear the case on May 5, 2025, before a bench comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna, Sanjay Kumar, and K. V. Viswanathan. The AIMPLB’s affidavit refutes the government’s position that historical waqf properties registered before April 8, 2025, remain unaffected by the amendment. The Union claims that registration only involves submitting basic information without requiring documentation. Key Objections by AIMPLB 1. Legal Validity of Waqfs-by-User AIMPLB contends that the revised Section 3(r) of the Act effectively derecognizes waqfs-by-user unless registered. This violates the principle of non-retrogression upheld in landmark cases like Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India. AIMPLB argues that waqfs have existed for centuries without registration being a prerequisite. 2. Historical Perspective The Board asserts that waqf registration has never been a requirement for its creation, citing the Mussalman Wakf Act of 1923. In Mohammed Ghouse v. Karnataka Board of Wakfs, the courts rejected claims that registration was necessary for waqf validity. 3. Discriminatory Implications AIMPLB argues that the amendment discriminates between registered and unregistered waqfs. This contradicts the intent of previous waqf regulations, including the Waqf Act of 1995, which emphasized recognition without making registration mandatory. Challenges to Government Claims AIMPLB highlights inconsistencies in the Union’s counter-affidavit. The government’s acknowledgment of “removing statutory protection to waqfs-by-user” is contradictory to its subsequent denial of such implications. The Board emphasizes that non-registration should not invalidate waqfs, as historically, only the mutawalli’s failure to register has attracted penalties. Constitutional Concerns The amendment’s prospective application does not address the broader implications for user-recognized waqfs. AIMPLB argues that: The removal of waqfs-by-user’s recognition violates Article 26 of the Constitution of India. Section 36(7A) enables government claims to supersede waqf registration, further jeopardizing waqf properties. Conclusion AIMPLB maintains that the Waqf (Amendment) Act undermines the historical and legal foundation of waqfs in India. It asserts that registration should not be a precondition for waqf recognition and calls for the Court to address the discriminatory and unconstitutional aspects of the amendment. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases AIMPLB Challenges WAQF Amendment Act 2025: Supreme Court Affidavit Highlights Risks of De-registration AIMPLB Challenges WAQF Amendment Act 2025: Supreme Court Affidavit Highlights Risks of De-registration Sada Law • May 4, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court: Bribery Conviction Under PC Act Requires Proof of Demand Beyond Recovery of Tainted Notes Supreme Court: Bribery Conviction Under PC Act Requires Proof of Demand Beyond Recovery of Tainted Notes Sada Law • May 4, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Clarifies Modification Powers Under Arbitration Act in Landmark Ruling Supreme Court Clarifies Modification Powers Under Arbitration Act in Landmark Ruling Sada Law • May 4, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

AIMPLB Challenges WAQF Amendment Act 2025: Supreme Court Affidavit Highlights Risks of De-registration Read More »

Waqf Amendment Bill Sparks Uproar: Opposition Moves Supreme Court Over Alleged Bias Against Muslims

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Waqf Amendment Bill Sparks Uproar: Opposition Moves Supreme Court Over Alleged Bias Against Muslims “NALSA Files PIL for Humanitarian Release of Aged and Sick Inmates from Indian Jails” Which law states that Aadhaar is required to operate bank accounts? Questions for the Supreme Court the Delhi government’s refusal to grant workers’ allowances Opening the Monument Examining the Long-Term Effects of the 1981 Case Francis Coralie v. Union Territory of Delhi on Individual Liberty and Indian Jurisprudence Rajya Sabha Adopts Bill 2025 for Waqf (Amendment) Destruction in Kancha Gachibowli ‘forest’ area depicts an ‘alarming picture’, says SC NCLT Rejects Insolvency Plea Against Zomato Over Payment Dispute Actor Hansika Motwani files a motion in the Bombay High Court to quash a FIR after being booked in a Section 498A case. Supreme Court slams Telangana CM for “making mockery” of anti-defection law Union Minister Kiren Rijiju: The Waqf Amendment Bill Is Prospective Rather Than Retrospective Waqf Amendment Bill Sparks Uproar: Opposition Moves Supreme Court Over Alleged Bias Against Muslims MAHI SINHA 07 Apr 2025 The opposition parties are concerned about the Waqf Amendment Bill, which aims to change the 1995 law controlling Waqf properties. New Delhi: As the contentious Waqf Amendment Bill seeks the President‘s approval after passing both Houses of Parliament, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) has joined the Congress and Asaduddin Owaisi‘s AIMIM as the third major opposition party to take on the bill in the Supreme Court. Opposition parties contend that the proposed legislation, which aims to modify the 1995 law managing Waqf properties, is biased and threatens Muslims. AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan said in his plea that the government’s intervention violates minorities’ rights to run own institutions and that the amendment will diminish Muslims’ religious autonomy. Nonetheless, the government has insisted that the measure will help Muslim women and guarantee openness in the administration of Waqf properties. Mr. Khan contested the Waqf Amendment Bill’s constitutionality, claiming that it infringes upon multiple basic liberties of citizens, such as the freedom of equality, the management of religious matters, and the rights of minorities. He said that the measure violates minorities’ rights to run their religious and philanthropic organizations, restricts Muslims’ religious and cultural autonomy, and permits capricious presidential intervention. His suit comes after two other opposition MPs, Asaduddin Owaisi and Mohammad Jawed, of the Congress, filed identical objections. The law prejudices against Muslims by enforcing limits that are absent from the governance of other religious institutions, according to Mr. Jawed, a member of the joint parliamentary commission on the Waqf bill. The law’s provision allowing non-Muslims to serve on state boards and Waqf councils is one of the main points of contention. According to Mr. Owaisi, this is a serious constitutional infringement and isn’t the instance with the Hindu Endowment Board or the Jain Endowment Board. Speaking to NDTV yesterday, Mr. Owaisi claimed that the BJP is utilizing the vast majority in parliament to wage a war on Muslims by passing legislation that will ruin and take away all of their rights rather than reforms. BJP MP Ravi Shankar Prasad defended the bill, telling NDTV that it will increase transparency by holding Waqf boards responsible. He made it clear that no mosque or cemetery will be impacted in an effort to dispel concerns that the measure would seize Waqf sites. After a contentious debate between the opposition and treasury benches, the Lok Sabha passed the Waqf bill Thursday morning by 288 votes to 232. The Rajya Sabha then passed it with 128 votes in favor and 95 against. Following Friday’s weekly prayers, the bill’s approval triggered massive demonstrations in cities including Ahmedabad, Chennai, and Kolkata. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Waqf Amendment Bill Sparks Uproar: Opposition Moves Supreme Court Over Alleged Bias Against Muslims Waqf Amendment Bill Sparks Uproar: Opposition Moves Supreme Court Over Alleged Bias Against Muslims sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 7, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments “NALSA Files PIL for Humanitarian Release of Aged and Sick Inmates from Indian Jails” “NALSA Files PIL for Humanitarian Release of Aged and Sick Inmates from Indian Jails” sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 6, 2025 • Live cases • 1 Comment Which law states that Aadhaar is required to operate bank accounts? Questions for the Supreme Court the Delhi government’s refusal to grant workers’ allowances Which law states that Aadhaar is required to operate bank accounts? Questions for the Supreme Court the Delhi government’s refusal to grant workers’ allowances sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 5, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Waqf Amendment Bill Sparks Uproar: Opposition Moves Supreme Court Over Alleged Bias Against Muslims Read More »

Get A Quote
Get A Quote