sadalawpublications.com

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Menu

judicial intervention

Gujarat High Court Orders Fresh SIT Probe Into Dalit Man’s Custodial Death Amid Allegations of Police Torture

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CCR, NUSRL, RANCHI Gujarat High Court Orders Fresh SIT Probe Into Dalit Man’s Custodial Death Amid Allegations of Police Torture INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT K&G TECHLAW PARTNERS Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Against Journalist in Official Secrets Act Case, Cites Press Freedom Supreme Court to Urgently Hear Petition on Same-Sex Couples’ Adoption Rights in India Madras High Court Allows Women to Join Temple Chariot Festival, Citing Equality and Religious Freedom Telangana High Court Cancels Free Land Allotment to IAMC Hyderabad in Landmark Ruling Court Orders FIR Against Zed News and News18 for Defamatory Reporting During Operation Sindoor in Jammu & Kashmir Delhi High Court Rules Arbitration Clause Doesn’t Automatically Override Civil Court Jurisdiction Supreme Court Affirms Right to Close Business Under Article 19 of Indian Constitution Gujarat High Court Orders Fresh SIT Probe Into Dalit Man’s Custodial Death Amid Allegations of Police Torture KASHISH JAHAN 1 JULY 2025 The Gujarat High Court has ordered a fresh SIT probe into the alleged custodial death of a 27-year-old Dalit man in Rajkot, highlighting critical concerns about police accountability and custodial violence in India. High Court Steps In Amid Allegations of Custodial Torture The Gujarat High Court has ordered the formation of a new Special Investigation Team (SIT) to investigate the alleged custodial death of a 27-year-old Dalit man in Rajkot. The man died within 24 hours of being detained over a minor theft allegation. Family Alleges Torture and Post-Mortem Tampering According to the victim’s family, he was subjected to severe custodial torture. They also claimed that the post-mortem report was tampered with to conceal the actual cause of death, contradicting physical injuries and witness statements. Initial Police Investigation Under Scrutiny The original investigation conducted by the district police cleared all involved officers, citing natural causes. However, ongoing protests by Dalit rights groups and mounting public pressure prompted the victim’s family to petition the court for an independent probe. Justice Biren Vaishnav Highlights Major Lapses Justice Biren Vaishnav stated that initial findings pointed to procedural irregularities, destruction of CCTV footage, and conflicting witness testimonies. The court ordered that a new SIT, led by an independent IPS officer, be formed and that a detailed report be submitted within two months. Debate Rekindled Over Police Accountability in India This incident has reignited national debate on police accountability and custodial violence. The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has frequently raised concerns over custodial deaths in India. The victim’s family called the court’s decision a “ray of hope for justice.” Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Gujarat High Court Orders Fresh SIT Probe Into Dalit Man’s Custodial Death Amid Allegations of Police Torture Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Against Journalist in Official Secrets Act Case, Cites Press Freedom Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court to Urgently Hear Petition on Same-Sex Couples’ Adoption Rights in India Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Gujarat High Court Orders Fresh SIT Probe Into Dalit Man’s Custodial Death Amid Allegations of Police Torture Read More »

Orissa High Court Slams ‘Bulldozer Justice’, Orders ₹2 Lakh Salary Recovery from Tahasildar for Illegal Demolition

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Orissa High Court Slams ‘Bulldozer Justice’, Orders ₹2 Lakh Salary Recovery from Tahasildar for Illegal Demolition LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DMD ADVOCATES LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SINGHANIA & PARTNERS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT K.L.E. SOCIETY’S LAW COLLEGES JOB OPPORTUNITY AT S.S. JAIN SUBODH LAW COLLEGE, JAIPUR LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT EQUATOR LAW CHAMBERS, NEW DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DEEPAK UPADHYAY, DELHI & NOIDA LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT APPAREL GROUP INDIA Supreme Court Probes Air India Crash: Safety Lapses, Legal Action, and Aviation Reforms Karnataka High Court Mandates Full Digitisation of Land Acquisition to Curb Corruption and Delays Orissa High Court Slams ‘Bulldozer Justice’, Orders ₹2 Lakh Salary Recovery from Tahasildar for Illegal Demolition PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 27 June 2025 The Orissa High Court has ordered a ₹2 lakh deduction from a Tahasildar’s salary for an unlawful demolition in Dharmasala, reinforcing constitutional rights and condemning bulldozer justice. Orissa High Court Cracks Down on Bulldozer Justice: Tahasildar Fined ₹2 Lakh for Illegal Demolition In a powerful verdict upholding constitutional safeguards and due process, the Orissa High Court has ordered a ₹2 lakh salary recovery from a Tahasildar responsible for an illegal demolition in Dharmasala, Odisha. The Court condemned the act as part of a “troubling pattern of bulldozer justice” and ruled it a violation of constitutional protections under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. Unlawful Eviction Without Due Process The incident involved the demolition of residential structures without issuing prior notices or conducting a fair hearing. The High Court found that eviction notices were served arbitrarily, bypassing the essential legal steps that ensure justice and administrative transparency. Key Legal Violations Identified According to the court, the demolition violated the principles of due process and amounted to arbitrary state action. The judgment emphasized that any demolition must comply with the following procedures: Issuing legally valid show-cause notices Allowing affected residents a proper opportunity to respond Ensuring oversight by appropriate administrative or judicial authorities Court Declares Demolition Notices Illegal The bench declared the demolition notices, specifically Annexure 6, to be legally invalid and ordered an immediate halt to any further evictions until proper legal channels are followed. This ruling aligns with previous directions by the Supreme Court of India, which has consistently criticized demolitions executed without due process. Personal Liability for State Officials Holding state officials personally accountable, the High Court ordered the recovery of ₹2 lakh from the Tahasildar’s salary. This sends a clear message that bureaucrats cannot bypass legal procedures or infringe on the fundamental rights of citizens under the guise of administrative action. A National Pattern of Judicial Pushback This ruling is consistent with a broader trend in Indian jurisprudence. Courts including the Allahabad High Court and Uttarakhand High Court have issued similar rulings, condemning “bulldozer politics” and ensuring that victims of arbitrary demolitions are compensated. Reinforcing Constitutional Values The judgment reinforces key democratic and legal principles: Upholds due process for all constructions, even unauthorized ones Protects against administrative overreach by demanding judicial scrutiny Strengthens rule of law by limiting unchecked executive actions A Landmark Victory for Civil Rights in Odisha This ruling is a significant win for civil liberties and judicial accountability in Odisha. It makes it unequivocally clear: no public servant—regardless of rank—has the authority to circumvent constitutional rights in the name of enforcement. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Orissa High Court Slams ‘Bulldozer Justice’, Orders ₹2 Lakh Salary Recovery from Tahasildar for Illegal Demolition Sada Law • June 27, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Probes Air India Crash: Safety Lapses, Legal Action, and Aviation Reforms Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Karnataka High Court Mandates Full Digitisation of Land Acquisition to Curb Corruption and Delays Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Orissa High Court Slams ‘Bulldozer Justice’, Orders ₹2 Lakh Salary Recovery from Tahasildar for Illegal Demolition Read More »

Supreme Court Slams Misuse of UP Gangsters Act, Demands Accountability from Uttar Pradesh Government

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Slams Misuse of UP Gangsters Act, Demands Accountability from Uttar Pradesh Government Delhi High Court Orders Ghadi Detergent to Remove Disparaging Surf Excel Remarks from Ads Supreme Court Petition Seeks Immediate Suspension of Air India’s Boeing Fleet Over Safety Concerns Supreme Court Refuses Urgent Listing of Hany Babu’s Bail Clarification Plea in Bhima Koregaon Case Supreme Court Clarifies Azure–PPL Copyright Stay: No Impact on Third Parties Bombay High Court Quashes 306 IPC FIR in Loan-Linked Suicide Case, Cites Lack of Instigation Punjab–Haryana High Court Rejects PIL Against Online Betting Ads, Citing Statutory Remedies Under Gambling Law Supreme Court Reserves Interim Order on Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025: Key Legal and Constitutional Highlights HDFC Bank CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan Moves Bombay HC to Quash FIR in ₹2 Crore Bribery Case Filed by Lilavati Trust IPS Officer’s Husband Arrested in ₹7.2 Crore BMC Redevelopment Scam: Mumbai EOW Crackdown Sparks Integrity Debate Supreme Court Slams Misuse of UP Gangsters Act, Demands Accountability from Uttar Pradesh Government KASHISH JAHAN 25 June 2025 The Supreme Court of India has reprimanded the Uttar Pradesh government for misuse of the UP Gangsters Act, raising crucial concerns about preventive detention, civil liberties, and legal reform in India. Supreme Court of India Slams Misuse of UP Gangsters Act In a significant move for the protection of civil liberties, the Supreme Court of India has strongly criticized the Uttar Pradesh government for its rampant misuse of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act. This landmark intervention could influence how preventive detention laws are enforced across the country. Widespread Abuse of Preventive Laws in Uttar Pradesh Multiple petitions filed in the Supreme Court exposed an alarming pattern: ordinary citizens—such as farmers, small traders, and activists—were charged under the UP Gangsters Act without any legitimate evidence of involvement in organized crime. Petitioners alleged that the Act had been weaponized to target political opponents, settle personal vendettas, and suppress dissent. Shockingly, data revealed that over 70% of those arrested under the Act were eventually acquitted or had charges dropped due to lack of evidence. Justice Sanjiv Khanna Raises Red Flags The bench, headed by Justice Sanjiv Khanna, voiced serious concern about the growing misuse of preventive laws. Originally designed to counter organized criminal activities, the law had been distorted to unjustly detain innocent civilians. The court directed the state government to submit a list of all cases filed under the Act over the past five years, along with the justification for each arrest. It also indicated that it may issue formal guidelines to restrict the arbitrary use of such draconian laws. Constitutional Implications and Fundamental Rights This case brings into sharp focus the conflict between national security interests and the fundamental rights enshrined under Part III of the Constitution of India. According to legal experts, the final ruling may clarify constitutional boundaries on the state’s power to implement preventive detention and provide stronger protections against wrongful incarceration. It also renews urgent calls for police reforms and greater judicial oversight of executive power. What Happens Next? The Supreme Court will revisit the matter in July 2025, at which point it will examine the data provided by the Uttar Pradesh government. Civil rights activists are optimistic that the case will lead to meaningful legal reform and greater transparency in the use of laws that enable preventive detention. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Slams Misuse of UP Gangsters Act, Demands Accountability from Uttar Pradesh Government Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Orders Ghadi Detergent to Remove Disparaging Surf Excel Remarks from Ads Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Petition Seeks Immediate Suspension of Air India’s Boeing Fleet Over Safety Concerns Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Slams Misuse of UP Gangsters Act, Demands Accountability from Uttar Pradesh Government Read More »

Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PEOPLESCIENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SARIN PARTNERS JOB OPPORTUNITY AT VIDHI CENTRE FOR LEGAL POLICY INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT UNITEDLEX JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NMIMS KIRIT P. MEHTA SCHOOL OF LAW Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests KASHISH JAHAN 06 June 2025 The Bombay High Court has permitted animal sacrifice during the Urs festival at Vishalgad Fort, Maharashtra, amid right-wing protests. Discover the court’s ruling, public response, and broader impact on religious freedom and heritage conservation. Judicial Intervention in Religious Practices The Bombay High Court has approved animal sacrifice in connection with the Urs festival at the Hazrat Peer Malik Rehan Dargah, situated within Vishalgad Fort in Maharashtra, India. The court’s decision has triggered criticism from various right-wing groups, reopening discussions around religious freedom and historical site preservation. Conditions Set by the Court The ruling allows the sacrifice to occur on private land located 1.4 kilometers from the fort. Importantly, the court stated that all sacrificial practices must take place within closed premises to prevent public display and ensure adherence to safety and hygiene regulations. Public Reaction and Rising Tensions In response, the Hindu Ekata Andolan organized protests demanding a ban on the Urs celebrations and any form of animal slaughter in or around the fort. The group has urged the Maharashtra State Government to file an appeal in the Supreme Court of India, arguing that the decision could set a concerning precedent for religious activities in historically significant locations. Balancing Religious Rights and Cultural Heritage This development underscores the delicate balance India must maintain between respecting religious practices and protecting cultural landmarks. The judiciary’s role is pivotal in mediating such complex conflicts where legal, emotional, and historical values intersect. Conclusion: A Landmark Ruling with Far-Reaching Impact The Bombay High Court’s decision reflects the ongoing challenge of safeguarding constitutional rights while preserving India’s heritage. As the case potentially moves toward the Supreme Court, it may shape future interpretations of religious freedom and public interest. For now, the ruling serves as a reminder of the judiciary’s role in bridging tradition and modern governance in a diverse society. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Limits Probe in ‘Operation Sindoor’, Upholds Fair Investigation Principles Supreme Court Limits Probe in ‘Operation Sindoor’, Upholds Fair Investigation Principles Sada Law • June 5, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Read More »

Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Ruling in Methodist Church Leadership Dispute Over Retirement Age

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Ruling in Methodist Church Leadership Dispute Over Retirement Age Delhi High Court Rejects PIL Over Illegal Construction Near Mehrauli Gurdwara, Cites Lack of Locus Standi Supreme Court Directs High Courts to Regularize Court Managers as Permanent Staff Delhi High Court Urges Swift COVID-19 Testing Guidelines to Tackle Infection Surge Supreme Court Clarifies Section 102(3) CrPC: Delay in Reporting Seizure Does Not Invalidate It – Shento Varghese v. Julfikar Husen (2024) Supreme Court Rules Bail Cancellation Requires Just Cause, Protects Personal Liberty Supreme Court Issues Notice on Son’s Plea Against Assam Police for Illegal Detention and Deportation to Bangladesh Woman Faces Criminal Charges for Concealing ₹10 Lakh in Divorce Settlement in Delhi NEET-PG 2025 Postponed: Supreme Court Directs Single-Shift Exam for Transparency and Fairness Allahabad High Court Upholds ₹273.5 Crore GST Penalty on Patanjali Ayurved Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Ruling in Methodist Church Leadership Dispute Over Retirement Age KASHISH JAHAN 05 June 2025 The Supreme Court of India pauses a controversial Bombay High Court ruling on leadership extension in the Methodist Church of India, highlighting the balance between religious autonomy and legal accountability. Leadership Crisis in the Methodist Church: Age or Authority? A leadership dispute within the Methodist Church of India has drawn legal scrutiny, raising questions about retirement norms and institutional governance. At the heart of the issue is whether senior bishops can remain in office beyond the Church’s accepted retirement age. The Controversy: Retirement Age Rules vs. Leadership Continuity The conflict began when two senior bishops, aged 76 and 73, were permitted by the Bombay High Court to retain their positions, despite exceeding the Church’s customary retirement age. This decision faced backlash from within the Church, with critics claiming it violates internal rules and obstructs the rise of younger leaders. Supreme Court Intervenes with a Temporary Stay On May 30, 2025, the Supreme Court of India granted a stay on the Bombay High Court’s interim ruling. This means the bishops in question must step aside until a comprehensive hearing is conducted. The apex court emphasized that while the matter is legal, it also touches on internal Church governance and age-old traditions. Legal Oversight in Religious Governance Religious institutions in India, such as the Methodist Church, often operate under unique traditions and self-regulatory frameworks. However, when internal disputes threaten fair leadership transitions or governance integrity, judicial oversight becomes essential to uphold accountability and prevent misuse of power. Striking a Balance: Religious Freedom and Legal Accountability This case underscores the delicate balance between institutional autonomy and judicial accountability. While religious bodies are entitled to manage their affairs independently, courts like the Supreme Court intervene when necessary to ensure fairness and uphold the rule of law. Conclusion: Ensuring Fair Leadership Transitions The Supreme Court’s stay is a pivotal step in maintaining integrity within religious leadership. It safeguards against arbitrary power extensions and reinforces that traditions must align with principles of legality and fairness. As the legal proceedings continue, this case could set a precedent for leadership norms in faith-based institutions across India. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Ruling in Methodist Church Leadership Dispute Over Retirement Age Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Ruling in Methodist Church Leadership Dispute Over Retirement Age Sada Law • June 5, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Rejects PIL Over Illegal Construction Near Mehrauli Gurdwara, Cites Lack of Locus Standi Delhi High Court Rejects PIL Over Illegal Construction Near Mehrauli Gurdwara, Cites Lack of Locus Standi Sada Law • June 5, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Directs High Courts to Regularize Court Managers as Permanent Staff Supreme Court Directs High Courts to Regularize Court Managers as Permanent Staff Sada Law • June 5, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Ruling in Methodist Church Leadership Dispute Over Retirement Age Read More »

Delhi High Court Halts Essential Medicine Price Hike to Protect Affordable Healthcare

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Delhi High Court Halts Essential Medicine Price Hike to Protect Affordable Healthcare RBI Fines XYZ Bank ₹10 Crore for KYC Norm Violations and AML Lapses Supreme Court: Divorced Muslim Women Entitled to Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Alongside 1986 Act Supreme Court Limits Appellate Powers Under Arbitration Act: Avoid Bulky Submissions, Stresses Efficiency Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail to Arvind Kejriwal in PMLA Case, Refers ED Arrest Challenge to Larger Bench Supreme Court Increases Permanent Alimony to ₹50,000 Monthly, Ensuring Ex-Wife’s Marital Standard of Living Supreme Court Rules No Temporary Injunction Allowed After Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Supreme Court Clears Teacher of Abetment Charges in Student Suicide Case Under Section 306 IPC Kerala High Court Upholds Trial of Bank Employee Accused of Threatening to Kill Chief Minister JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PUNJABI UNIVERSITY, BATHINDA COLLEGE OF LAW Delhi High Court Halts Essential Medicine Price Hike to Protect Affordable Healthcare KASHISH JAHAN 02 June 2025 The Delhi High Court has stayed the price hike of essential medicines in India, addressing healthcare affordability concerns and emphasizing the public’s right to accessible treatment. Delhi High Court Blocks Essential Medicine Price Hike to Protect Public Health Healthcare affordability in India remains a major concern, especially for low-income families. In a landmark move, the Delhi High Court has issued a stay on the recent price hike of several essential medicines. This decision comes amid rising public health challenges, including the ongoing threat of the COVID-19 pandemic and other widespread diseases. Impact of Price Hike on Vulnerable Populations Recent increases in drug prices by leading pharmaceutical companies raised significant concerns. Petitioners argued that the abrupt spike in essential medicine costs could severely burden economically disadvantaged households. For many families already facing financial strain, this price surge could make life-saving drugs inaccessible. Court Steps In to Protect Right to Affordable Healthcare Recognizing the urgency of the issue, the Delhi High Court ordered a temporary stay on the price hike and urged the government to conduct a thorough review. The ruling aims to strike a balance between allowing pharma companies reasonable profit margins and protecting citizens’ constitutional right to health. Judicial Support for Equitable Healthcare Policies The court’s action reinforces the judiciary’s role in upholding fundamental rights against corporate interests. It emphasizes the importance of keeping essential healthcare services affordable and accessible, even while supporting innovation and profitability in the pharmaceutical sector. Wider Implications for Pharma Pricing and Policy This stay order sends a powerful message to pharmaceutical firms to consider the broader social impact of their pricing strategies. In times of health crises, affordable access to medicines can be a matter of survival. The Delhi High Court’s intervention not only supports vulnerable populations but also calls on the government and industry to prioritize public health. Healthcare advocates, economists, and policymakers are closely watching this case, as it could significantly influence future regulations around drug pricing in India’s healthcare system. Conclusion: A Crucial Win for Affordable Healthcare in India The Delhi High Court’s decision to stay the price hike of essential medicines marks a pivotal moment in India’s healthcare landscape. It demonstrates a firm commitment to ensuring that economic policies do not compromise the public’s fundamental right to affordable medical care. As the nation continues to face health challenges, from the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic to rising costs in the healthcare system, this ruling reinforces the need for balanced, humane, and sustainable drug pricing policies. Ultimately, it sends a clear signal to the pharmaceutical industry and policymakers alike — that in a country of over a billion people, healthcare must remain a right, not a privilege. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Delhi High Court Halts Essential Medicine Price Hike to Protect Affordable Healthcare Delhi High Court Halts Essential Medicine Price Hike to Protect Affordable Healthcare Sada Law • June 2, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments RBI Fines XYZ Bank ₹10 Crore for KYC Norm Violations and AML Lapses RBI Fines XYZ Bank ₹10 Crore for KYC Norm Violations and AML Lapses Sada Law • June 2, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Increases Permanent Alimony to ₹50,000 Monthly, Ensuring Ex-Wife’s Marital Standard of Living Supreme Court Increases Permanent Alimony to ₹50,000 Monthly, Ensuring Ex-Wife’s Marital Standard of Living Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Delhi High Court Halts Essential Medicine Price Hike to Protect Affordable Healthcare Read More »

Get A Quote
Get A Quote