sadalawpublications.com

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Menu

gender justice

Supreme Court Orders States to Clear Backlog in Fast Track Courts for Gender Crimes — Justice Can’t Wait

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Orders States to Clear Backlog in Fast Track Courts for Gender Crimes — Justice Can’t Wait Delhi High Court Seeks Accountability for Custodial Deaths — Justice Beyond the Bars LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT MANDLA & SINGH LAW CHAMBERS, DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GAURAV SHARMA LAW OFFICES LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT HIKMAT HELPING HANDS FOUNDATION LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JSA, BENGALURU Supreme Court Presses States on Governors’ Discretion: Federal Structure in Question Supreme Court Questions Centre on Algorithmic Policing and AI Bias: A Step Toward Digital Rights Reform LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT BOBBLE AI INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT SETTLEMENTOFLOAN Supreme Court Orders States to Clear Backlog in Fast Track Courts for Gender Crimes — Justice Can’t Wait Kashish Jahan 31 JULY 2025 The Supreme Court has directed States to address vacancies in fast track courts for gender-based crimes, citing severe delays in justice. The ruling pushes for urgent compliance with constitutional promises under Articles 15 and 21. Fast Track Courts, Delayed Justice On 25 July 2025, the Supreme Court of India expressed deep concern over the poor functioning of fast track courts (FTCs) handling sexual offences and crimes against women. Justice Renu Awasthi called the backlog a “betrayal” of the legislative promise made to survivors, especially after the Nirbhaya case led to stricter laws. Despite dedicated courts and funding, survivors are still trapped in legal delays, often facing years-long trials that add layers of trauma. Shocking Data Revealed by Women’s Rights Groups A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a coalition of women’s rights organizations revealed systemic negligence: Over 50% of FTCs established after 2013 and 2018 remain understaffed or vacant. Rape cases often continue for 2–3 years, defeating the purpose of “fast-track” trials. The National Commission for Women (NCW) reported widespread non-compliance with laws mandating: Child-friendly courtrooms Witness protection systems This failure persists despite special funds and legal mandates specifically designed to ensure speedy and sensitive justice. Supreme Court’s Tough Stand and Orders The Bench issued clear instructions to State governments: Submit updated data on judicial vacancies and infrastructure. Set timelines for filling vacant positions in FTCs. Implement child-friendly facilities in courtrooms. Activate witness protection programs immediately. Justice Awasthi reminded the States that dignity and access to justice are not “budget leftovers” — they are fundamental rights under Article 15 (protection from discrimination) and Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) of the Constitution of India. What Comes Next: The August Deadline The matter will be heard again in August. If States fail to comply with the orders, the Court has indicated it may appoint special panels to monitor implementation directly. Women’s rights activists and legal experts believe this ruling is a crucial turning point. It pushes for real-time justice, aligning strong laws with effective and compassionate courtroom processes. Conclusion: Matching Laws with Action India has made legal strides in the wake of brutal crimes like Nirbhaya, but enforcement lags behind. The Supreme Court’s intervention signals that gender justice must move beyond promises — it must be swift, sensitive, and survivor-centric. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Orders States to Clear Backlog in Fast Track Courts for Gender Crimes — Justice Can’t Wait Sadalaw • July 31, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Seeks Accountability for Custodial Deaths — Justice Beyond the Bars Sadalaw • July 31, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Presses States on Governors’ Discretion: Federal Structure in Question Sadalaw • July 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Orders States to Clear Backlog in Fast Track Courts for Gender Crimes — Justice Can’t Wait Read More »

Madras High Court Allows Women to Join Temple Chariot Festival, Citing Equality and Religious Freedom

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Madras High Court Allows Women to Join Temple Chariot Festival, Citing Equality and Religious Freedom Telangana High Court Cancels Free Land Allotment to IAMC Hyderabad in Landmark Ruling Court Orders FIR Against Zed News and News18 for Defamatory Reporting During Operation Sindoor in Jammu & Kashmir Delhi High Court Rules Arbitration Clause Doesn’t Automatically Override Civil Court Jurisdiction Supreme Court Affirms Right to Close Business Under Article 19 of Indian Constitution Bombay High Court Halts Aarey Forest Demolition: Legal Win for Environment and Tribal Rights Delhi High Court Orders Centre to Draft Deepfake Guidelines: Major Step for Digital Privacy and Free Speech in India Supreme Court Clears Uttarakhand’s Uniform Civil Code: A Historic Step Toward Gender Equality and Secular Law in India Supreme Court Reviews CAA Rules 2024: Fresh Petitions Challenge Citizenship Law on Constitutional Grounds Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe into ₹3,200 Crore Bihar Foodgrain Scam: Political Fallout and Fight Against Corruption Madras High Court Allows Women to Join Temple Chariot Festival, Citing Equality and Religious Freedom KASHISH JAHAN 1 JULY 2025 In a historic verdict, the Madras High Court affirms women’s constitutional right to participate in Tamil Nadu’s traditional temple chariot procession, striking down a discriminatory centuries-old ban. Historic Ruling by Madras High Court on Women’s Temple Entry In a landmark judgment, the Madras High Court has upheld the right of women to participate in the annual temple chariot procession at a centuries-old temple in Tamil Nadu. This progressive ruling overturns a long-standing ban that prevented women from pulling the sacred chariot ropes during the festival. Legal Challenge Based on Constitutional Rights A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by a group of female devotees. They argued that the restriction violated their fundamental rights under Article 14 (Right to Equality) and Article 25 (Freedom of Religion) of the Indian Constitution. The temple management, however, defended the ban as a “customary tradition” tied to ritual purity. Justice Anita Sumanth: Tradition Cannot Override the Constitution Delivering the verdict, Justice Anita Sumanth ruled that traditional customs cannot override the constitutionally protected rights of citizens. The Court emphasized that “constitutional morality must prevail over traditional patriarchy,” reinforcing the supremacy of gender equality and individual religious freedom. Inspiration from the Supreme Court’s Sabarimala Verdict The ruling draws parallels with the groundbreaking Sabarimala verdict by the Supreme Court of India, which allowed women of all ages to enter the Sabarimala temple in Kerala. Like that case, this decision marks a significant step forward in breaking gender barriers in religious practices. Support from Gender Rights Activists and Devotees The judgment has been celebrated by gender rights groups and devotees across the country. Advocates hailed it as a powerful move against outdated and discriminatory religious norms that restrict women’s participation in sacred rituals and festivals. Temple Authorities Ordered to Facilitate Women’s Participation In closing, the Court directed temple authorities to ensure the smooth and safe inclusion of women in this year’s temple festival, scheduled to begin next week. This ensures immediate enforcement of the ruling and sets a strong precedent for inclusive temple practices across India. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Madras High Court Allows Women to Join Temple Chariot Festival, Citing Equality and Religious Freedom Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Telangana High Court Cancels Free Land Allotment to IAMC Hyderabad in Landmark Ruling Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Court Orders FIR Against Zed News and News18 for Defamatory Reporting During Operation Sindoor in Jammu & Kashmir Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Madras High Court Allows Women to Join Temple Chariot Festival, Citing Equality and Religious Freedom Read More »

Kerala High Court Empowers Muslim Women: Khula Divorce Valid Without Husband’s Consent

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Kerala High Court Empowers Muslim Women: Khula Divorce Valid Without Husband’s Consent Orissa High Court Slams ‘Bulldozer Justice’, Orders ₹2 Lakh Salary Recovery from Tahasildar for Illegal Demolition LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DMD ADVOCATES LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SINGHANIA & PARTNERS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT K.L.E. SOCIETY’S LAW COLLEGES JOB OPPORTUNITY AT S.S. JAIN SUBODH LAW COLLEGE, JAIPUR LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT EQUATOR LAW CHAMBERS, NEW DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DEEPAK UPADHYAY, DELHI & NOIDA LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT APPAREL GROUP INDIA Supreme Court Probes Air India Crash: Safety Lapses, Legal Action, and Aviation Reforms Kerala High Court Empowers Muslim Women: Khula Divorce Valid Without Husband’s Consent KASHISH JAHAN 27 June 2025 The Kerala High Court has ruled that Muslim women have the right to divorce through khula without their husband’s consent, marking a major win for gender equality and personal law reform in India. Progressive Interpretation of Muslim Personal Law In a groundbreaking judgment, the Kerala High Court has affirmed a Muslim woman’s right to independently seek divorce through khula, even without her husband’s consent. This historic ruling is being recognized as a significant advancement for women’s rights and gender justice within the framework of religious personal laws in India. Understanding the Legal Case: Cruelty and Compatibility Issues The case centered around a Muslim woman who filed for divorce citing cruelty and incompatibility in her marriage. However, the lower family court denied her petition, stating that her husband’s consent was necessary under Muslim Personal Law. Challenging this interpretation, the woman escalated the matter to the High Court. High Court’s Ruling: A Woman’s Inalienable Right to Divorce The division bench of the Kerala High Court, drawing from Quranic teachings and previous decisions by the Supreme Court of India, ruled that a Muslim woman has an absolute and unconditional right to end her marriage through khula. The court emphasized that principles of personal dignity, freedom, and gender equality must guide the modern interpretation of religious laws in a secular, democratic nation like India. Implications for Gender Equality and Legal Reform This landmark decision sets a vital precedent for gender-equal applications of personal law and adds momentum to the broader discourse surrounding the proposed Uniform Civil Code (UCC). It also empowers Muslim women across India by reaffirming their legal autonomy and rights within marriage and divorce laws. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Kerala High Court Empowers Muslim Women: Khula Divorce Valid Without Husband’s Consent Sada Law • June 27, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Orissa High Court Slams ‘Bulldozer Justice’, Orders ₹2 Lakh Salary Recovery from Tahasildar for Illegal Demolition Sada Law • June 27, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Probes Air India Crash: Safety Lapses, Legal Action, and Aviation Reforms Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Kerala High Court Empowers Muslim Women: Khula Divorce Valid Without Husband’s Consent Read More »

Supreme Court to Review Plea for Uniform Marriage Age of 21 Across Genders

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court to Review Plea for Uniform Marriage Age of 21 Across Genders Supreme Court Slams Misuse of UP Gangsters Act, Demands Accountability from Uttar Pradesh Government Delhi High Court Orders Ghadi Detergent to Remove Disparaging Surf Excel Remarks from Ads Supreme Court Petition Seeks Immediate Suspension of Air India’s Boeing Fleet Over Safety Concerns Supreme Court Refuses Urgent Listing of Hany Babu’s Bail Clarification Plea in Bhima Koregaon Case Supreme Court Clarifies Azure–PPL Copyright Stay: No Impact on Third Parties Bombay High Court Quashes 306 IPC FIR in Loan-Linked Suicide Case, Cites Lack of Instigation Punjab–Haryana High Court Rejects PIL Against Online Betting Ads, Citing Statutory Remedies Under Gambling Law Supreme Court Reserves Interim Order on Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025: Key Legal and Constitutional Highlights HDFC Bank CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan Moves Bombay HC to Quash FIR in ₹2 Crore Bribery Case Filed by Lilavati Trust Supreme Court to Review Plea for Uniform Marriage Age of 21 Across Genders KASHISH JAHAN 25 June 2025 The Supreme Court of India is set to examine a PIL seeking a uniform marriage age of 21 years for all genders. Discover the key arguments, constitutional implications, and what this could mean for gender equality and legal reform in India. Supreme Court of India to Hear Plea for Uniform Marriage Age In a landmark development that could reshape India’s personal laws and promote gender equality, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking a uniform minimum marriage age of 21 for all genders and religions. The case has sparked a nationwide discussion on gender justice, constitutional rights, and personal law reform. The PIL and the Case for Uniform Marriage Age The PIL was filed by advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, who argues that the current disparity in marriage age—21 for men and 18 for women—violates the fundamental rights enshrined in Article 14 (Right to Equality), Article 15 (Prohibition of Discrimination), and Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) of the Indian Constitution. The plea highlights that early marriage for women often leads to school dropouts, health risks, and entrenched gender inequality. A uniform age could ensure a level playing field, encourage educational attainment, and improve overall women’s health and empowerment. Court’s Response and Involvement of Central Authorities A bench headed by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud issued a notice to the central government, asking for its official response within six weeks. The court acknowledged that the issue touches upon critical constitutional questions, particularly concerning gender equality and social justice. The bench also requested the opinions of the Law Commission of India and the National Commission for Women, signaling its intent to address the matter with both legal precision and social sensitivity. Constitutional, Legal, and Social Implications A ruling in favor of a uniform marriage age could be a turning point in India’s journey toward gender-just laws. It may lead to reform of personal laws, many of which are still governed by patriarchal traditions. This could also strengthen calls for a Uniform Civil Code, a long-debated topic in Indian legal circles. Socially, a consistent marriage age could contribute to improved health outcomes for women, delay childbearing, and increase female participation in higher education and the workforce—key indicators of national development. What Lies Ahead? The government is expected to file its affidavit soon. The case will be examined in detail later this year. As public debate intensifies, supporters see this move as a progressive step toward legal uniformity and gender equality, while critics warn against judicial interference in personal laws. The outcome of this case could influence the future of marriage law in India, setting a precedent for reform grounded in constitutional values and social equity. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court to Review Plea for Uniform Marriage Age of 21 Across Genders Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Slams Misuse of UP Gangsters Act, Demands Accountability from Uttar Pradesh Government Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Orders Ghadi Detergent to Remove Disparaging Surf Excel Remarks from Ads Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court to Review Plea for Uniform Marriage Age of 21 Across Genders Read More »

Supreme Court Landmark Ruling: Permanent Alimony and Home Ownership Rights for Divorced Women

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Landmark Ruling: Permanent Alimony and Home Ownership Rights for Divorced Women Supreme Court Landmark Alimony Verdict Redefines Dignity and Rights of Divorced Women in India Supreme Court Empowers Victims: Right to Appeal Acquittals Confirmed The Fodder Scam Redux: Supreme Court Revives Corruption Trials in Bihar Ahead of Elections Why the Supreme Court Revoked Bail for Ex-Karnataka Minister Vinay Kulkarni in Murder Case INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT ECONOMIC LAW PRACTICE Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Congress MLA Vinay Kulkarni in BJP Worker Yogesh Gowda Murder Case Over Witness Tampering INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT THE CASE LAW Allahabad High Court Grants Relief to BBC Journalist in Mosque Demolition FIR and Passport NOC Case JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LEXLEGIS.AI, DELHI Supreme Court Landmark Ruling: Permanent Alimony and Home Ownership Rights for Divorced Women Kashish jahan 10 June 2025 Supreme Court of India orders permanent alimony and home ownership rights for divorced women, enhancing financial security and gender justice. Learn about this landmark ruling and its impact on divorce settlements. A New Dawn for Divorced Women’s Financial Security For many divorced women in India, life after separation can be challenging—facing financial insecurity, social stigma, and the daunting task of rebuilding their lives. Recently, the Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark ruling that promises a brighter future for divorced women by ensuring permanent alimony and granting home ownership rights. Supreme Court’s Groundbreaking Alimony and Property Order The case involved a woman who was initially awarded a modest monthly alimony of ₹20,000 by the Calcutta High Court. Considering her ex-husband’s substantial monthly income of ₹4 lakh and her lack of income or property, the Supreme Court found the alimony insufficient. The apex court increased the monthly alimony to ₹50,000 and ordered a 5% increment every two years to adjust for inflation. More importantly, the Court directed the transfer of the family home’s ownership to her name, recognizing the need for tangible security beyond monthly payments. Why This Ruling is Revolutionary for Divorced Women This verdict acknowledges the often overlooked sacrifices homemakers make, such as quitting jobs or sacrificing career growth to manage households. By granting both permanent alimony and home ownership, the Supreme Court has empowered divorced women with financial stability and dignity. Impact on Gender Justice and Future Divorce Settlements This ruling marks a significant step forward in gender justice, setting a powerful precedent for future cases. Courts are encouraged to consider the real-life impact of their decisions and provide divorced women with more than just temporary financial aid—helping them truly thrive post-divorce. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Why the Supreme Court Revoked Bail for Ex-Karnataka Minister Vinay Kulkarni in Murder Case Why the Supreme Court Revoked Bail for Ex-Karnataka Minister Vinay Kulkarni in Murder Case Sada Law • June 10, 2025 • Case law, Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Judgment on Arbitration Appeals: Limits on Remand and Emphasis on Efficiency in Bombay Slum Redevelopment Case (2024) Supreme Court Judgment on Arbitration Appeals: Limits on Remand and Emphasis on Efficiency in Bombay Slum Redevelopment Case (2024) Sada Law • June 9, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Affirms Divorced Muslim Women Can Claim Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Despite 1986 Act Supreme Court Affirms Divorced Muslim Women Can Claim Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Despite 1986 Act Sada Law • June 9, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Landmark Ruling: Permanent Alimony and Home Ownership Rights for Divorced Women Read More »

Supreme Court Affirms Divorced Muslim Women Can Claim Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Despite 1986 Act

Leave a Comment / Case law /

Trending Today Supreme Court Affirms Divorced Muslim Women Can Claim Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Despite 1986 Act Supreme Court: No Withdrawal of Murder Prosecution Solely Due to Accused’s Political Status Supreme Court Judgment on CIC’s Power to Form Benches & Frame Regulations Under RTI Act – Central Information Commission v. DDA, 2024 Allahabad High Court Rejects Relief for Man Over ‘Coward-PM Modi’ Social Media Posts Amid India-Pakistan Ceasefire DY Chandrachud Appointed as Key Authority in Russia-Wintershall Energy Arbitration under Energy Charter Kerala High Court Rules Medical Negligence Is Not Culpable Homicide in Doctor’s Case NHAI Challenges Madras High Court’s Toll Ban on Madurai-Tuticorin Highway in Supreme Court Supreme Court Slams Misuse of Preventive Detention After Bail Grant in Kerala Case Supreme Court Directs Streamlined Implementation of RTI Act for Easier Access to Information Remission Shouldn’t Be Denied Solely on Reports of Presiding Judge or Police: Supreme Court Lays Down Factors for Premature Release Supreme Court Affirms Divorced Muslim Women Can Claim Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Despite 1986 Act REHA BHARGAV 09 June 2025 In a landmark 2024 judgment, the Supreme Court ruled that divorced Muslim women can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC, reinforcing gender justice and clarifying the coexistence of secular and personal laws. Introduction – A Landmark Judgment in Muslim Women’s Maintenance Rights On July 10, 2024, the Supreme Court of India delivered a historic verdict in the case of Mohd Abdul Samad v. The State of Telangana & Anr. The ruling clarified that divorced Muslim women are entitled to seek maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), 1973, in addition to the remedies available under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986. Presided over by Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice Augustine George Masih, the decision highlights the importance of gender-neutral, secular laws in preventing destitution and promoting social justice. Case Background – Facts at a Glance Timeline of Events Marriage Date: November 15, 2012 Separation: 2016 Divorce via Talaq: 2017 Maintenance Claim: Filed under Section 125 CrPC After the divorce, the respondent filed a petition under Section 125 CrPC seeking monthly maintenance. The Family Court awarded ₹20,000 per month, later reduced to ₹10,000 by the Telangana High Court. Dissatisfied, the husband approached the Supreme Court, arguing that only the 1986 Act should apply. Key Legal Issue Can a divorced Muslim woman claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC despite the provisions of the 1986 Act? Arguments Presented Petitioner’s Argument (Mohd Abdul Samad) Argued that Section 125 CrPC does not apply to divorced Muslim women. Claimed that the 1986 Act provides an exclusive remedy, limited to the iddat period. Stated that applying CrPC would violate Muslim personal law. Respondent’s Argument (Wife) Emphasized that Section 125 CrPC is a secular and gender-neutral social welfare law. Cited precedent set in Danial Latifi v. Union of India supporting co-existence of both laws. Highlighted her lack of income and inability to sustain herself. Supreme Court Verdict – Section 125 CrPC Is Applicable The Supreme Court rejected the appeal and ruled that: Section 125 CrPC applies to all individuals regardless of religion. The 1986 Act does not override the CrPC. Both laws can be used together, depending on the facts. The law’s intent is to prevent vagrancy and destitution, not adhere strictly to personal laws. Justice B.V. Nagarathna further emphasized that maintenance is a legal right, not charity, affirming the economic value of homemakers. Conclusion – A Win for Gender Justice and Equality The judgment in Mohd Abdul Samad v. The State of Telangana & Anr affirms that Section 125 CrPC provides protection beyond personal laws. It ensures financial support for divorced Muslim women, reinforcing constitutional principles of equality and dignity. This progressive decision strengthens the legal framework supporting women’s rights in India, and provides a crucial precedent for interpreting secular and personal laws harmoniously. Key Takeaways Divorced Muslim women are entitled to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC beyond the iddat period. The 1986 Act does not exclude the applicability of CrPC. This verdict promotes secularism, equality, and gender justice in Indian family law. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Affirms Divorced Muslim Women Can Claim Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Despite 1986 Act Supreme Court Affirms Divorced Muslim Women Can Claim Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Despite 1986 Act Sada Law • June 9, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court: No Withdrawal of Murder Prosecution Solely Due to Accused’s Political Status Supreme Court: No Withdrawal of Murder Prosecution Solely Due to Accused’s Political Status Sada Law • June 9, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Judgment on CIC’s Power to Form Benches & Frame Regulations Under RTI Act – Central Information Commission v. DDA, 2024 Supreme Court Judgment on CIC’s Power to Form Benches & Frame Regulations Under RTI Act – Central Information Commission v. DDA, 2024 Sada Law • June 9, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Affirms Divorced Muslim Women Can Claim Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Despite 1986 Act Read More »

Supreme Court: Divorced Muslim Women Entitled to Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Alongside 1986 Act

Leave a Comment / Case law /

Trending Today Supreme Court: Divorced Muslim Women Entitled to Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Alongside 1986 Act Supreme Court Limits Appellate Powers Under Arbitration Act: Avoid Bulky Submissions, Stresses Efficiency Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail to Arvind Kejriwal in PMLA Case, Refers ED Arrest Challenge to Larger Bench Supreme Court Increases Permanent Alimony to ₹50,000 Monthly, Ensuring Ex-Wife’s Marital Standard of Living Supreme Court Rules No Temporary Injunction Allowed After Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Supreme Court Clears Teacher of Abetment Charges in Student Suicide Case Under Section 306 IPC Kerala High Court Upholds Trial of Bank Employee Accused of Threatening to Kill Chief Minister JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PUNJABI UNIVERSITY, BATHINDA COLLEGE OF LAW LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT BHARATI VIDYAPEETH Karnataka High Court Rules Police Cannot Access Call Records Without Justified Investigation Supreme Court: Divorced Muslim Women Entitled to Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Alongside 1986 Act REHA BHARGAV 02 June 2025 The Supreme Court of India ruled in Mohd Abdul Samad v. State of Telangana (2024) that divorced Muslim women are entitled to maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, in addition to remedies under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986. This landmark judgment strengthens gender justice and financial rights for divorced Muslim women. Introduction The landmark Supreme Court judgment in Mohd Abdul Samad v. The State of Telangana & Anr (2024) reaffirms that divorced Muslim women can claim maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), 1973, alongside protections offered by the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986. Delivered on July 10, 2024, this ruling upholds secular, gender-neutral rights and strengthens financial security for divorced Muslim women. Case Background The case arose from a matrimonial dispute where Mohd Abdul Samad divorced his wife through talaq in 2017. The divorced wife sought maintenance under Section 125 CrPC, after the Family Court directed the husband to pay monthly maintenance. The husband challenged the order, arguing that the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 was the exclusive remedy for maintenance claims post-divorce. Legal Issue Key Question:Can a divorced Muslim woman claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC, despite the existence of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986? Arguments Presented Petitioner’s (Husband’s) Argument The husband argued that once divorce was granted under Muslim personal law, the wife’s right to maintenance was limited strictly to the iddat period under the 1986 Act, excluding Section 125 CrPC claims. Respondent’s (Wife’s) Argument The wife contended that Section 125 CrPC is a secular and gender-neutral provision designed to prevent destitution and is applicable irrespective of religion or personal laws. She argued that the 1986 Act provides additional remedies but does not bar claims under Section 125 CrPC. Supreme Court Judgment The Supreme Court, led by Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Augustine George Masih (official SC website), unanimously upheld the applicability of Section 125 CrPC to divorced Muslim women. The Court clarified: Section 125 CrPC is a social welfare provision preventing vagrancy and destitution. The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 does not override or exclude maintenance claims under Section 125 CrPC. Both laws coexist, enabling divorced Muslim women to seek maintenance under either or both remedies. Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC is a legal obligation, not charity, affirming gender justice and financial empowerment for divorced women. The Supreme Court dismissed the husband’s appeal and upheld the maintenance order directing monthly payments to the divorced wife. Conclusion The Supreme Court’s decision in Mohd Abdul Samad v. The State of Telangana & Anr is a significant milestone for divorced Muslim women’s rights in India. By affirming that Section 125 CrPC applies alongside the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, the ruling ensures stronger financial protection and gender equality. This judgment marks a progressive step toward upholding secular legal safeguards while respecting personal laws. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court: Divorced Muslim Women Entitled to Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Alongside 1986 Act Supreme Court: Divorced Muslim Women Entitled to Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Alongside 1986 Act Sada Law • June 2, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Limits Appellate Powers Under Arbitration Act: Avoid Bulky Submissions, Stresses Efficiency Supreme Court Limits Appellate Powers Under Arbitration Act: Avoid Bulky Submissions, Stresses Efficiency Sada Law • June 2, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail to Arvind Kejriwal in PMLA Case, Refers ED Arrest Challenge to Larger Bench Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail to Arvind Kejriwal in PMLA Case, Refers ED Arrest Challenge to Larger Bench Sada Law • June 2, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court: Divorced Muslim Women Entitled to Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Alongside 1986 Act Read More »

Get A Quote
Get A Quote