Supreme Court Strikes Down 2020 Environmental Clearance Exemption for Roads and Pipelines
Trending Today Supreme Court Strikes Down 2020 Environmental Clearance Exemption for Roads and Pipelines Constitutional Challenge to Demonetisation: Supreme Court Judgment on RBI Act and Legal Validity of 2016 Currency Ban Landmark Supreme Court Judgment Affirms Right to Die with Dignity in India: Eases Rules on Living Wills and Euthanasia Supreme Court Reforms ECI Appointment Process: Anoop Baranwal vs Union of India Judgment Explained Supreme Court Allows Ashish Mishra to Visit Lakhimpur Kheri Every Weekend Under Strict Conditions Rush to Trademark ‘Operation Sindoor’ Escalates Amid Ongoing Conflict, with Reliance and Others Filing Claims 21 Northern Indian Airports Closed Until May 10 Due to Military Tensions Near Pakistan Border J&K High Court: Magistrates Can Issue Pre-Cognizance Notices Under BNSS Even in Cheque Bounce Cases Operation Sindoor: India Eliminates IC-814 Hijack Mastermind Abdul Rauf Azhar in Precision Strikes Operation Sindoor: India’s Precision Strikes After Pahalgam Terror Attack Raise Cross-Border Tensions Supreme Court Strikes Down 2020 Environmental Clearance Exemption for Roads and Pipelines NITU KUMARI 09 May 2025 The Supreme Court of India ruled that the 2020 MoEF notification exempting linear projects like roads and pipelines from prior Environmental Clearance was unconstitutional. Learn about the judgment, its impact, and why public consultation matters in environmental law in India. Introduction On March 21, 2024, the Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment in the case of Noble M. Paikada vs Union of India, addressing the legality of exemptions granted to certain infrastructure projects from prior Environmental Clearance (EC). This case significantly impacts environmental regulation and public participation in India. Background of the Case The 2006 and 2016 Notifications Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) introduced the 2006 Notification, which mandated EC for projects classified as Category A and B before construction or expansion. In 2016, the MoEF updated this with a new notification exempting certain activities like dredging and silt removal for construction or maintenance under Item 6, following public consultation. The Controversial 2020 Notification On March 28, 2020, the MoEF issued the 2020 Notification, amending the 2016 rules without public consultation. It allowed extraction of ordinary soil for “linear projects” such as roads and pipelines without requiring EC—prompting legal challenges. Legal Challenge and Key Issue The 2020 amendment was challenged in the National Green Tribunal (NGT) and later appealed to the Supreme Court. The core issue: Was Item 6 of the 2020 Notification—granting exemption from EC for soil excavation in linear projects—arbitrary, ambiguous, and unconstitutional? Supreme Court Judgment Highlights Violation of Article 21 The Court ruled the exemption violated Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which guarantees the right to a pollution-free environment. Skipping public consultation made the notification unconstitutional. Ignoring Public Participation The 2020 Notification breached Rule 5(3) of the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986. Unlike the 2016 amendment, it failed to invite public objections, undermining the democratic process in environmental policymaking. Arbitrary and Vague Provisions The Court criticized the exemption for being: Ambiguous: Lacking clarity on excavation limits, methods, or oversight. Arbitrary: No justification for exempting linear projects during a COVID-19 lockdown. Unregulated: No authority defined to determine what qualifies as a “linear project.” As a result, Item 6 of the 2020 Notification was struck down. Impact and Significance of the Ruling This ruling reinforces that environmental governance in India must involve transparency and public participation. The judgment strengthens judicial oversight and sets a precedent for: Upholding environmental rights under Article 21 Ensuring public consultation in environmental decision-making Preventing arbitrary exemptions for infrastructure projects Conclusion The Supreme Court’s decision in Noble M. Paikada vs Union of India underscores the balance between development and environmental protection. By invalidating the EC exemption for linear projects, the Court reaffirmed the need for clarity, regulation, and public engagement in environmental law. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Strikes Down 2020 Environmental Clearance Exemption for Roads and Pipelines Supreme Court Strikes Down 2020 Environmental Clearance Exemption for Roads and Pipelines Sada Law • May 9, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Constitutional Challenge to Demonetisation: Supreme Court Judgment on RBI Act and Legal Validity of 2016 Currency Ban Constitutional Challenge to Demonetisation: Supreme Court Judgment on RBI Act and Legal Validity of 2016 Currency Ban Sada Law • May 9, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Landmark Supreme Court Judgment Affirms Right to Die with Dignity in India: Eases Rules on Living Wills and Euthanasia Landmark Supreme Court Judgment Affirms Right to Die with Dignity in India: Eases Rules on Living Wills and Euthanasia Sada Law • May 9, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »
