Allahabad High Court

Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sadalaw Publications

Trending Today Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Wildlife Conservation Laws in India: Legal Framework, Importance & Key Acts “Drone Usage in India: Laws, Regulations, and the Future of UAV Technology” RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Supreme Court Directs Policy Reform in Mining Royalty: Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. v. Union of India Explained Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court MAHI SINHA 21 Apr 2025 Overview of the Court Verdict In a strong move to uphold judicial dignity, the Allahabad High Court‘s Lucknow bench sentenced lawyer Ashok Pandey to six months of simple imprisonment for criminal contempt. The ruling, delivered on April 19, 2025, stems from a 2021 contempt case in which Pandey used offensive language and made derogatory remarks during an open court session. What Did the Lawyer Say? Pandey reportedly said that “the judges are behaving like goondas,” a statement the court deemed highly inappropriate and disrespectful. His comments were seen as a direct attack on the integrity of the judiciary and disrupted the decorum of the courtroom. Court’s Ruling and Penalties Imposed The division bench of Justices Vivek Chaudhary and Brij Raj Singh directed Pandey to: Serve six months of simple imprisonment Pay a fine of ₹2,000 Face an additional one-month jail term if the fine isn’t paid within a month In addition, the court asked why Pandey should not be barred from practicing law for three years at the Allahabad High Court and its Lucknow bench. Court’s Observation on Repeated Misconduct The court stated that this was not an isolated incident. Pandey had reportedly shown similar misconduct in the past, indicating a pattern of behavior that undermines judicial authority. The contempt jurisdiction, as emphasized by the bench, is meant to protect public trust in the legal system—not individual judges. Next Steps in the Case Pandey has been instructed to: Submit his response to the court’s notice Appear in person at the next hearing scheduled for May 1, 2025 Action Taken by the Court Administration To ensure transparency and enforcement, the court ordered that a copy of the ruling be forwarded to the Registrar General and senior registrars of both the Allahabad and Lucknow benches. Conclusion The Allahabad High Court has taken a firm stand on contempt of court, sending a strong message that disrespect towards the judiciary will not be tolerated. This case is a reminder of the importance of maintaining courtroom decorum and upholding the sanctity of legal institutions. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw Publications. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Sadalaw Publications • April 21, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Sadalaw Publications • April 20, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Sadalaw Publications • April 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Read More »

The Supreme Court rejects the Writ Petition against the Allahabad High Court, holding that grabbing breasts and severing the pyjama string does not amount to an attempt at rape.

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sadalaw Publications

Trending Today The Supreme Court rejects the Writ Petition against the Allahabad High Court, holding that grabbing breasts and severing the pyjama string does not amount to an attempt at rape. In the death case of actor Sushant Singh Rajput, the CBI files a closure report. Men Accused of Vandalizing the spot Where Artist Kunal Kamra Played Are Released on Bail by Mumbai Court Kunal Kamra’s Joke On Eknath Shinde Sparks Political Storm In Maharashtra: N Hariharan, a senior advocate, was elected president of the Delhi High Court Bar Association. PMLA | Supreme Court: The person who is accused in the complaint does not have to be named in order to keep the property that has been seized. Assam Government Notifies Supreme Court of Deportation of 13 Bangladeshi Nationals; Verification Continues for Others Supreme Court Petition Challenges SEBI Inquiry on Adani, Demands SIT Formation Punjab & Haryana High Court Issues Notice on Habeas Corpus Plea for Arrested Farmer Leader Jagjit Singh Dhallewal Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act Protection Not Available If Person Entered Into Agreement Knowing About Pending Litigation: Supreme Court The Supreme Court rejects the Writ Petition against the Allahabad High Court, holding that grabbing breasts and severing the pyjama string does not amount to an attempt at rape. MAHI SINHA 26 Mar 2025 Updated: 24th march,2025 The Allahabad High Court‘s ruling that grasping a young girl’s bosom, severing the thread of her pajamas, and making an effort to pull her under a culvert wouldn’t qualify as rape or an attempted rape was overturned by the Supreme Court of India today in a writ case. A party who has never heard of the criminal proceedings submitted the writ petition. Under Article 136, a Special Leave Petition must be submitted to the SC in order to contest a High Court order. Many rulings by the Supreme Court have found that a writ petition filed under Article 32 cannot be maintained against a High Court decision. According to the prosecution, the 11-year-old victim’s bosom was grabbed by the accused, Pawan and Akash, who then snapped the thread of her pajamas and made an effort to pull her under the culvert. The concerned trial court invoked Section 376 and Section 18 (attempt to commit an offence) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, deeming it an attempt to commit penetrative sexual assault or rape, and issued a summons order in accordance with these provisions. Nonetheless, the High Court mandated that the accused be tried in accordance with Section 354-B IPC (assault or use of criminal force with purpose to disrobe) and Section 9/10 of the POCSO Act, which are minor charges. There was a great deal of debate surrounding the edict, and many people were against it. The Advocate’s opening remarks before a bench of Justices Bela M. Trivedi and PB Varale stated that the motto “Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao” exists. He was about to continue when Justice Bela interrupted, saying that “no lecture baazi” should be permitted in the courtroom. She also asked why the counsel who filed the writ petition was not in the courtroom and who his name was on file. Although he was not there, the Advocate retorted that the AOR had given him permission to debate. After that, Justice Bela asked why the petitioner, who was also absent, was there. After that, the Court dismissed the writ petition. The Union Government, the Ministry of Women and Child Welfare, and the Allahabad High Court were all cited as respondents in the case by the petitioner. The High Court made a distinction in this case between preparation and attempt. According to the facts of the case and the accusations made against Pawan and Akash, the accused hardly ever attempted rape. To file a charge of attempted rape, the prosecution must prove that the case had progressed past the preparatory stage. As the bench of Justice Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra partially granted the criminal revision petition made by three accused, it noted that the main distinction is that there is more determination between planning and actually attempting to conduct an offense. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases The Supreme Court rejects the Writ Petition against the Allahabad High Court, holding that grabbing breasts and severing the pyjama string does not amount to an attempt at rape. The Supreme Court rejects the Writ Petition against the Allahabad High Court, holding that grabbing breasts and severing the pyjama string does not amount to an attempt at rape. sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments In the death case of actor Sushant Singh Rajput, the CBI files a closure report. In the death case of actor Sushant Singh Rajput, the CBI files a closure report. sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Men Accused of Vandalizing the spot Where Artist Kunal Kamra Played Are Released on Bail by Mumbai Court Men Accused of Vandalizing the spot Where Artist Kunal Kamra Played Are Released on Bail by Mumbai Court sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

The Supreme Court rejects the Writ Petition against the Allahabad High Court, holding that grabbing breasts and severing the pyjama string does not amount to an attempt at rape. Read More »

The issue of recovering money from an HC judge’s home is discussed by the Rajya Sabha.

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sadalaw Publications

Trending Today The issue of recovering money from an HC judge’s home is discussed by the Rajya Sabha. Delhi judge Yashwant Varma transferred amid cash row, Allahabad court says we are not trash bin: Senior Advocate Can’t Appear In Supreme Court Without An AOR; Non-AORs Can Argue Only If Instructed By An AOR : Supreme Court BCI Has No Business Interfering With Legal Education’ : Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against HC Allowing 2 Convicts To Attend Law School Virtually Merchant Navy Officer’s murder:Parents Disown Daughter Accused Of Killing Husband ,Says ‘She Should Be Hanged’ The Dhanashree Verma – Yuzvendra Chahal Saga: A Legal Perspective on Alimony and Marital Disputes Daughter-In-Law Integral Part Of Family, Entitled To Compassionate Appointment: Andhra Pradesh High Court Decoding Nagpur violence: Aurangzeb Tomb Row : 69 Rioters Arrested,Section 144 Imposed Six Supreme Court Judges Will Lead NALSA’s Legal Aid and Humanitarian Assistance Mission to Manipur Relief Camps UPSC Cheating Case : Complete Investigation Against Ex-IAS Officer Puja Khedkar Steadfastly, Supreme Court Tells Delhi Police The issue of recovering money from an HC judge’s home is discussed by the Rajya Sabha. MAHI SINHA 23 Mar 2025 Updated: 21th march,2025 The Rajya Sabha discussed the alleged recovery of a large pile of unaccounted cash from the official residence of Justice Yashwant Varma, a sitting judge of the Delhi High Court, today. In response, Vice-President and Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar said he would take all necessary procedural steps to address the matter. Jairam Ramesh, a Karnataka Member of Parliament for the Indian National Congress, brought up the matter with Dhankhar during the morning session, pointing out that the country was awakened to the “shocking case” of vast amounts of cash discovered at the home of a Delhi High Court judge. He brought up the notice of impeachment that 50 members of Parliament sent to the Chairman last December regarding some of the statements made by Justice Shekhar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court during an event hosted by the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) legal cell in Prayagraj. Ramesh asked the Chairman to speak with the government about the need to take action to guarantee judicial accountability in the selection of judges. “You yourself have repeatedly called into question the urgency for judicial accountability. You had, in fact, directed the leader of the House on this issue. Sir, I request you to make some observations on this issue and give necessary directions to the Government to come up with a proposal for increasing judicial accountability,” Ramesh told the Chairman. To this, the Chairman responded: “Hon’ble members, I am seized of a representation by 55 members of this House and I have taken all necessary steps to get their verification. The first email was sent to all of them. The good thing is, most of the members have responded positively, helping me perform my duty. Some members are yet to do so. A second email reiterating the same has been sent to them. I have taken all procedural steps…those members who have not done so far may respond to the second email sent to them, then the process will not be delayed at my level even for a moment.” “What irritates me is that the incident occurred and did not come to light right away,” he continued. “A systematic response with a transparent, accountable, and effective mechanism will undoubtedly be on the way if it occurs with a politician because he becomes a target. Subject to their consent, I shall speak with the leaders of the House and the Opposition to identify a process for a structured decision during the session.” A process of internal investigation has been started by the Supreme Court of India against Justice Yashwant Varma. It has been suggested that the judge be moved to the Allahabad High Court pending the investigation. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case laws ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 7, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 4 Next »

The issue of recovering money from an HC judge’s home is discussed by the Rajya Sabha. Read More »

Delhi judge Yashwant Varma transferred amid cash row, Allahabad court says we are not trash bin:

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sadalaw Publications

Trending Today Delhi judge Yashwant Varma transferred amid cash row, Allahabad court says we are not trash bin: Senior Advocate Can’t Appear In Supreme Court Without An AOR; Non-AORs Can Argue Only If Instructed By An AOR : Supreme Court BCI Has No Business Interfering With Legal Education’ : Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against HC Allowing 2 Convicts To Attend Law School Virtually Merchant Navy Officer’s murder:Parents Disown Daughter Accused Of Killing Husband ,Says ‘She Should Be Hanged’ The Dhanashree Verma – Yuzvendra Chahal Saga: A Legal Perspective on Alimony and Marital Disputes Daughter-In-Law Integral Part Of Family, Entitled To Compassionate Appointment: Andhra Pradesh High Court Decoding Nagpur violence: Aurangzeb Tomb Row : 69 Rioters Arrested,Section 144 Imposed Six Supreme Court Judges Will Lead NALSA’s Legal Aid and Humanitarian Assistance Mission to Manipur Relief Camps UPSC Cheating Case : Complete Investigation Against Ex-IAS Officer Puja Khedkar Steadfastly, Supreme Court Tells Delhi Police PMLA | The Supreme Court ruled that the money laundering offense persists as long as criminal proceeds are hidden, utilized, or presented as untainted. Delhi judge Yashwant Varma transferred amid cash row, Allahabad court says we are not trash bin: NITU KUMARI 23 Mar 2025 Updated: 22th march,2025 Who is Justice Yashwant Varma? Justice Varma was born in Allahabad on January 6, 1969, and attended Hansraj College, Delhi University, to get a BCom (Honours) degree before earning his law degree. On October 13, 2014, he was named an Additional Judge of the Allahabad High Court. Later, on February 1, 2016, he was sworn in as a Permanent Judge before being transferred to the Delhi High Court on October 11, 2021. Prior to his elevation, he also held the position of Chief Standing Counsel for the Uttar Pradesh government between 2012 and 2013, during which time he was designated as a Senior Advocate. Justice Varma is the son of former Allahabad High Court judge A N Varma. So what really happened in the Delhi High Court Judge Justice Yashwant Varma controversy so far? Despite its impressiveness, Justice Varma’s career has not been without controversy. The Supreme Court Collegium has suggested that he be sent to the Allahabad High Court in light of the recent discovery of cash discovered at his home during a fire. Given his judicial and administrative positions in Delhi, where he had a significant influence on the development of legal procedures, this action has drawn criticism. It is impossible to ignore Justice Varma’s legal contributions in spite of the controversy. His career has had a long-lasting effect on Indian law, from important constitutional law verdicts to his membership in well-known committees. Justice Varma’s house reports incident of fire. Fire department in action. Reports surface about unaccounted cash recovered from his residence. Supreme Court judges assemble late. Collegium assembled post 11 AM. Sources privy to the meeting confirm that transfer approved by Collegium. It is stated that an in-house inquiry has begun, with a report from Delhi High Court Chief Justice sought. Fire department says no cash found. Supreme Court press release says transfer still not recommended and separate from in-house inquiry. Only confirmation is a report from Delhi High Court Chief Justice sought. Why are legal professionals advocating for judicial transparency? The Supreme Court Collegium recommended that Justice Yashwant Varma be transferred from the Delhi High Court back to the Allahabad High Court, and he has had a distinguished legal career spanning several decades. However, the decision to shift him follows reports of unaccounted cash being found at his official residence, raising concerns about transparency and judicial accountability. The controversy surrounding Justice Varma has intensified demands for institutional reforms, with legal experts insisting on stronger mechanisms to uphold the credibility and integrity of the judiciary. Senior advocate Indira Jaising has urged the Collegium to “immediately disclose the exact amount of money recovered” to prevent speculation surrounding the case. Meanwhile, Senior Advocate and Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal emphasised the gravity of corruption within the judiciary, calling for urgent reforms in the judicial appointment process. Sibal stated:“The issue of corruption within the judiciary is a very serious one. This is not something that has been raised for the first time; it has been ongoing for years. It is time for the Supreme Court to review how appointments are made. The process should be more transparent and carefully conducted.” He further criticised the current administration, saying, “Corruption is a very serious issue, and despite what PM Modi has said, it has only increased.” “Allahabad High Court is not a trash bin”: Bar Association opposes transfer of Justice Yashwant Varma “We will not accept corrupt people. We will close the court work if needed… We will go sine die if needed,” the Bar President told Bar and Bench. The Allahabad High Court Bar Association has taken strong objection to the Supreme Court Collegium’s recommendation for repatriation of Delhi High Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma to the Allahabad High Court, following the recovery of unaccounted cash from his residence. The Bar Association, in a press release, expressed shock over the move to transfer him to the Allahabad High Court. “Allahabad High Court kude ka dibba nahi hai jo yahan bhej diya gaya hai (Allahabad High Court is not a trash bin that he has been sent here),” the Bar Association President Anil Tiwari told Bar and Bench. “We will not accept corrupt people. We will close the court work if needed. This is a press release for a general body meeting on Monday (March 24), and then we will take action. We will go sine die if needed,” Tiwari added. The controversy surrounding the recovery of cash from the residence of Justice Yashwant Varma threw the legal fraternity into a frenzy on Friday morning. The Bar Association press note mentions that ₹15 crore cash was recovered from the judge’s residence. Various media outlets reported that a huge pile of cash was inadvertently recovered from the house of the judge when a fire brigade had gone there to douse a

Delhi judge Yashwant Varma transferred amid cash row, Allahabad court says we are not trash bin: Read More »

Minority Status of educational institutions not affected by statute, date of establishment, or non-minority administration

Leave a Comment / Case law / Sadalaw Publications

Trending Today Validity of LMV Driving License for Transport Vehicles Minority Status of educational institutions not affected by statute, date of establishment, or non-minority administration JAMMU AND KASHMIR POST ARTICLE 370 ANIMAL CRUELTY CONTROVERSY: HOW THE 2023 SCC DECISION AFFECT JALIKATTU Role of technology in transforming the Indian judiciary COMMON CAUSE v. UNION OF INDIA 2018 Legal Framework governing reproductive rights and abortion law The Impact of Contract Law on E-Commerce and Online Transactions Indian Parliament Addressing Judicial Issues in Revenge Porn Cases Minority Status of educational institutions not affected by statute, date of establishment, or non-minority administration :Supreme Court on 8th November, 2024 03 Mar 2025 Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal, 2024 Civil Appeal no. 2286 of 2006 Parties involved : Aligarh Muslim University ……….. Appellant Vs. Naresh Agarwal & Ors“ ………..Respondents Date of judgement: 8th november 2024 President Judges:- Dr. DY Chandrachud, CJ., Sanjiv Khanna, Surya Kant, JB Pardiwala, Dipankar Datta, Manoj Misra and Satish Chandra Sharma Facts and judgement :- In an appeal against Allahabad High Court’s Order in Naresh Agarwal (Dr.) v. Union of India, 2005 whereby, Aligarh Muslim University’s (‘AMU’) action of 50 percent seat reservation in postgraduate medical courses for Muslim candidates by claiming it to be a minority institution, was struck down and held that AMU cannot have an exclusive reservation because it is not a minority institution, the Seven-Judge Constitution Bench comprising of Dr. DY Chandrachud, CJ., Sanjiv Khanna, Surya Kant, JB Pardiwala, Dipankar Datta, Manoj Misra and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ. in 4: 3 overruled the Five-Judge Bench verdict in S. Azeez Basha v. Union of India, 1967, which held that an institution incorporated by a statute cannot claim to be a minority institution, hence AMU as created by an Act of Parliament, is not a minority institution so as to be covered under Article 30 of the Constitution of India. Issues: Whether an educational institution must be both established and administered by a linguistic or religious minority to secure the guarantee under Article 30? What are the criteria to be satisfied for the ‘establishment’ of a minority institution? Whether Article 30(1) envisages an institution which is established by a minority with participation from members of other communities; Whether a minority educational institution which is registered as a society under the Societies Registration Act 1860 soon after its establishment loses its status as a minority educational institution by virtue of such registration; and Whether the decision of this Court in Prof. Yashpal v. State of Chhattisgarh (2005) 5 SCC 420 and the amendment of National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions Act 2005 in 2010 have a bearing on the question formulated above and if so, in what manner…. Brief Undertanding about Amu through the time line in this case 1877- Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, Founded the Muhammadan Anglo- orientation college (MAO Colle) at aligarh The britishers imperial legislative council enacted the aligarh muslim university Act (AMU Act) incorporating AMU as a university Indian independence Indian constitution Article 30 A constitution bench (5 judge) in which held that an institution incorporated by a statute cannot claim to be a minority institution, hence AMU as created by an Act of Parliament, is not a minority institution so as to be covered under Article 30 of the Constitution of India. Parliament enacted the aligarh muslim University (Amendment) Act, 1981. This Amendment chenged the AMU Act and changed the definition of the word “University” as an institution “established by the muslims of India, etc. Note: the parliament tried to rectify the mistakes becoz of which AMU lost the minority university status. The AMU reserved 50% seats in postgraduate medical courses for muslim andidates by claaming it to be a minority institution. This bill was challedged in Dr. Naresh Agarwal v Union of India . The Allahabad High Court struch down the reservation policy and held that the AMU couldnot have an exclusive reservation because it was not a minority institution acoording to S. Azeez Basha. A three judges bench heard the AMU’S appeal and referred the decision in S. Azeez Basha for reconsideration by a seven – judge bench. Decision- The Suprme court by a 4:3 majority overruled Azeezz Basha. The majority held that merely because an institution is created by a statute does not strip it of minority status. The majority also held that Article 30(1) protectes institutes established before the constitution came into force in 1950. The court laid criteria to determine when an institution is a minority institution benefitting from Article 30(1) protection. The Court further laid down the factors which must be used to determine if a minority ‘established’ an educational institution: The indicia of ideation, purpose and implementation must be satisfied. First, the idea for establishing an educational institution must have stemmed from a person or group belonging to the minority community; second, the educational institution must be established predominantly for the benefit of the minority community; and third, steps for the implementation of the idea must have been taken by the member(s) of the minority community; and The administrative set up of the educational institution must elucidate and affirm (I) the minority character of the educational institution; and (II) that it was established to protect and promote the interests of the minority community. The Court overruled the view taken in Azeez Basha (supra) that an educational institution is not established by a minority if it derives its legal character through a statute. 4 Comments ANIMAL CRUELTY CONTROVERSY: HOW THE 2023 SCC DECISION AFFECT JALIKATTU – sadalawpublications.comFebruary 27, 2025 at 8:19 am | Edit […] law The Impact of Contract Law on E-Commerce and Online Transactions Indian Parliament Addressing Judicial Issues in Revenge Porn Cases Triviality section 95 INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION v.

Minority Status of educational institutions not affected by statute, date of establishment, or non-minority administration Read More »

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL